Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

unable to load symbols for tests on xp buildbot #285

Closed
derekbruening opened this issue Nov 28, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

unable to load symbols for tests on xp buildbot #285

derekbruening opened this issue Nov 28, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@derekbruening
Copy link
Contributor

From [email protected] on February 02, 2011 09:20:57

a bunch of tests are failing on the xp buildbot with errors like these:

3: E:\b\build\slave\win_xp_drm_checkout\build\build_drmemory-dbg-32/logs/DrMemory-free.exe.3320.000/results.txt
3: failed to match "free.c:46"
3:
4: E:\b\build\slave\win_xp_drm_checkout\build\build_drmemory-dbg-32/logs/DrMemory-registers.exe.3816.000/results.txt
4: failed to match "registers.c:194"
4:
2: E:\b\build\slave\win_xp_drm_checkout\build\build_drmemory-dbg-32/logs/DrMemory-malloc.exe.1724.000/results.txt
2: failed to match "malloc.c:95"

we have no line #s:
Error #1: UNADDRESSABLE ACCESS: reading 0x000559a3-0x000559a4 1 byte(s)
@0:00:02.172 in thread 3008
Note: prev lower malloc: 0x00055908-0x00055988
Note: 0x000559a3-0x000559a4 overlaps freed memory 0x00055998-0x000559bc
0x00401087 <free.exe+0x1087> free.exe!?
??:0
0x004017c3 <free.exe+0x17c3> free.exe!?
??:0
0x7c817077 <KERNEL32.dll+0x17077> KERNEL32.dll!RegisterWaitForInputIdle
??:0

WARNING: unable to load symbols for E:\b\build\slave\win_xp_drm_checkout\build\build_drmemory-dbg-32\tests\free.exe

WARNING: unable to load symbols for E:\b\build\slave\win_xp_drm_checkout\build\build_drmemory-dbg-32\tests\registers.exe

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/drmemory/issues/detail?id=285

@derekbruening
Copy link
Contributor Author

From [email protected] on February 10, 2011 08:34:22

This issue was closed by revision r169 .

Status: Fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant