-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support passing function as param to flow, then executing it #264
Comments
Another workaround is to pass an object that contains the function, and call it as |
Thanks for the report. Can I see the original call (from the DSL) please? |
It was like this
The last line is the problem :)
This works. |
I will try to see if we can update to 0.35 and maybe it's already working there. In any case if you don't already have a test case like this, makes sense to add one. |
I've added a function param to my flow file (it's intended as a callback).
I then try to call it in flow.
It throws an exception:
As a workaround I pass that function to an initialization controller, which then calls it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: