-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bromite Basic Fingerprinting Protection #11
Comments
Brave and Firefox RFP cover many dozens of metrics, but Bromite's patchset only covers a dozen or so? |
I'm sorry, but I don't understand, is this a question? Because is the same question I am asking you :) maybe I didn't explain myself well: my curiosity is how and why you define bromite's anti-fingerprint protection to be basic. can I ask you for the source? Is there any study I can read? |
There is no study or in-depth technical analysis here or even definition of my categorization, the labels are just based off of my understanding. I'm not saying I am right here, I'm asking you as the author of many of the patches for clarification. |
thanks for the explanation.
OK, I understand.
perfect I thank you. no, honestly it is not my goal to list the differences with brave/firefox and bromite, I know brave's code but not firefox's, I know (more or less) what brave does but not what firefox does. maybe, if I may, but I don't feel obligated, it's just a suggestion from a technician to a technician, then you do what you want, I would add a post in which you indicate the lack of sources and that it's a personal opinion, unless it's already there and I haven't seen it (and then I apologize). thank you anyway! |
Ciao Tad,
we don't know each other directly but, for better or worse, I am continuing carl's work on bromite.
I would kindly ask you, with reference to https://divestos.org/pages/browsers and with a view to improving the browser, on what basis do you define "Basic" the Fingerprinting protection in bromite? could you point out what you think is missing?
thank you in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: