Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Brainstorming: Natural Post Integration for Plugins #50

Open
neruthes opened this issue Aug 2, 2020 · 10 comments
Open

Brainstorming: Natural Post Integration for Plugins #50

neruthes opened this issue Aug 2, 2020 · 10 comments

Comments

@neruthes
Copy link
Contributor

neruthes commented Aug 2, 2020

We will try finding a better solution for DimensionDev/Maskbook#1360 here.

@OiCkilL
Copy link

OiCkilL commented Aug 3, 2020

image
Here is my design.
I thought it would make it easier to use.

@neruthes
Copy link
Contributor Author

neruthes commented Aug 3, 2020

image
Here is my design.
I thought it would make it easier to use.

LGTM. Any other idea for entry point? In my initial draft, the entry point is in a dropdown menu and it seems that you have alternative proposals for it.

@OiCkilL
Copy link

OiCkilL commented Aug 3, 2020

image
Here is my design.
I thought it would make it easier to use.

LGTM. Any other idea for entry point? In my initial draft, the entry point is in a dropdown menu and it seems that you have alternative proposals for it.

The dropdown menu not a best solution. It is not user-friendly to add encrypted descriptions after using the plug-in.

@neruthes
Copy link
Contributor Author

neruthes commented Aug 3, 2020

image
Here is my design.
I thought it would make it easier to use.

LGTM. Any other idea for entry point? In my initial draft, the entry point is in a dropdown menu and it seems that you have alternative proposals for it.

The dropdown menu not a best solution. It is not user-friendly to add encrypted descriptions after using the plug-in.

Is there a specific alternative solution that you recommend?

@Jack-Works
Copy link
Member

I thought you are talking about API here

@neruthes
Copy link
Contributor Author

neruthes commented Aug 3, 2020

I thought you are talking about API here

API is important, too. Let it be discussed here. Also feel free to create a separate issue if you find necessary.

@OiCkilL
Copy link

OiCkilL commented Aug 11, 2020

image
Here is my design.
I thought it would make it easier to use.

LGTM. Any other idea for entry point? In my initial draft, the entry point is in a dropdown menu and it seems that you have alternative proposals for it.

The dropdown menu not a best solution. It is not user-friendly to add encrypted descriptions after using the plug-in.

Is there a specific alternative solution that you recommend?

Like facebook may better?
截屏2020-08-11 下午2 10 52
截屏2020-08-11 下午2 10 58

@neruthes
Copy link
Contributor Author

image
Here is my design.
I thought it would make it easier to use.

LGTM. Any other idea for entry point? In my initial draft, the entry point is in a dropdown menu and it seems that you have alternative proposals for it.

The dropdown menu not a best solution. It is not user-friendly to add encrypted descriptions after using the plug-in.

Is there a specific alternative solution that you recommend?

Like facebook may better?
截屏2020-08-11 下午2 10 52
截屏2020-08-11 下午2 10 58

We have 2 restrictions related to this matter:

  • It should work in the current framework before future refactoring.
  • Its entry should be as similar as possible across different social networks.

Both restrictions propose challenges to the idea of merging the entry of Plugins-defined custom types to SNS-specific lists of types.

@OiCkilL
Copy link

OiCkilL commented Aug 19, 2020

image
Here is my design.
I thought it would make it easier to use.

LGTM. Any other idea for entry point? In my initial draft, the entry point is in a dropdown menu and it seems that you have alternative proposals for it.

The dropdown menu not a best solution. It is not user-friendly to add encrypted descriptions after using the plug-in.

Is there a specific alternative solution that you recommend?

Like facebook may better?
截屏2020-08-11 下午2 10 52
截屏2020-08-11 下午2 10 58

We have 2 restrictions related to this matter:

  • It should work in the current framework before future refactoring.
  • Its entry should be as similar as possible across different social networks.

Both restrictions propose challenges to the idea of merging the entry of Plugins-defined custom types to SNS-specific lists of types.

The entry is identical on this case, both from the Compose window.
I don't understand the limitations of the current framework, I asked the Binrui and he said there is no problem to implement it.However, the drop-down menu idea would be difficult to implement and would be a UX bug.

@neruthes
Copy link
Contributor Author

image
Here is my design.
I thought it would make it easier to use.

LGTM. Any other idea for entry point? In my initial draft, the entry point is in a dropdown menu and it seems that you have alternative proposals for it.

The dropdown menu not a best solution. It is not user-friendly to add encrypted descriptions after using the plug-in.

Is there a specific alternative solution that you recommend?

Like facebook may better?
截屏2020-08-11 下午2 10 52
截屏2020-08-11 下午2 10 58

We have 2 restrictions related to this matter:

  • It should work in the current framework before future refactoring.
  • Its entry should be as similar as possible across different social networks.

Both restrictions propose challenges to the idea of merging the entry of Plugins-defined custom types to SNS-specific lists of types.

The entry is identical on this case, both from the Compose window.
I don't understand the limitations of the current framework, I asked the Binrui and he said there is no problem to implement it.However, the drop-down menu idea would be difficult to implement and would be a UX bug.

A prototype in Figma will be helpful for further detailed evaluation, as we visualize the idea.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants