We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Now that nist is done we should modify Digi-Id and DigiByte to use CRYSTALS-Dilithium algo. Would be nice if part of 8.22
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/07/nist-selects-quantum-proof-algorithms-to-head-off-the-coming-cryptopocalypse/?amp=1
For a time at least Digi-Id needs to use both. A new address scheme is probably best for DigiByte so it can be soft forked in.
Algo Details: https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Presentations/Crystals-Dilithium/images-media/CRYSTALS-Dilithium-April2018.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Any idea on how we would go about this, has this been done in any other blockchain?
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Now that nist is done we should modify Digi-Id and DigiByte to use CRYSTALS-Dilithium algo. Would be nice if part of 8.22
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/07/nist-selects-quantum-proof-algorithms-to-head-off-the-coming-cryptopocalypse/?amp=1
For a time at least Digi-Id needs to use both. A new address scheme is probably best for DigiByte so it can be soft forked in.
Algo Details:
https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Presentations/Crystals-Dilithium/images-media/CRYSTALS-Dilithium-April2018.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: