-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix the IPv6 support #847
Comments
@Someguy123 you are right! in the middle of the 1.0 release battle, testing multiple components we forgot about the frontend changes for IPv6. |
@t-kitipot this is currently not supported but we are planning to add it. See DefGuard/wireguard-rs#81 for details/progress. |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I just installed Defguard for us to consider using it at our company instead of pure wireguard, unfortunately it seems Defguard doesn't seem to allow IPv6 addresses for the gateway subnet, endpoint, nor for DNS - which renders Defguard useless for our company as our existing Wireguard VPN network is almost exclusively IPv6-only. Defguard does appear to accept IPv6 subnets in the Allowed IPs section but that's not very useful when the VPN has no IPv6 address or subnet
More and more companies (including my own) are using IPv6 especially for their internal networks such as VPNs to conserve IPv4 addresses, so it's important for Defguard to have at least basic IPv6 support
Describe the solution you'd like
It would be great if Defguard could add support for IPv6 addresses / subnets ideally alongside IPv4 - for example:
10.1.2.1/24,2a07:e01::1/48
in the "Gateway VPN IP address and netmask" box so that the VPN has both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses2a07:e00::333
- preferably allow for multiple DNS servers with mixing and matching IPv4 and IPv6 DNS servers2a07:e01::1
All of the above is supported with native Wireguard, so it's purely Defguard itself which requires updating to support IPv6
Additional context
Screenshots showing Defguard v1.0.0 rejecting IPv6 addresses/subnets on the "Edit Location" screen:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: