-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DFIP-2208-B: Move further rewards from DUSD-DFI to USDT-DUSD / USDC-DUSD Pools #201
Comments
During your vote please consider that a smaller DUSD-DFI pool also brings some negative effects which should not be overlocked:
As one of the bigger whales and traders, I think that the big pool size of the DUSD-DFI pool was never a problem. There would be more than enough traders on the Defichain to move the price of the DUSD-DFI pool extremely fast, no matter the size of the pool. The only problem is that nobody will do this if the peg of the DUSD can not be trusted, which is mainly caused by surplus of DUSD. This means our main goals should be to make the dToken system more attractive and to focus on the burning/lockup of our current DUSD surplus. In my opinion, these goals can not be reached with bigger DUSD-USDT/USDC pools. I think the fastest way to get rid of the DUSD is with a DFI pump to 2-3$, a huge DUSD-DFI pool and a burn fee of 30%. This would lead to the biggest burns and the most locked up DUSD inside the DUSD-DFI pool. P.S.: A DFIP for redistribution of pool rewards costs 500 DFI. Why does this not apply to this DFIP? (Why should there be an exception for dTokens) |
Yeah that is a good question. It'd be nice to have a comment before voting starts so pinging @kynkong91 @uzyn Thanks! |
Thanks for the clarifying question. The clause stating "500 DFI for reallocation of block rewards" pertains only to block level reward allocation. This specific DFIP-2208-B only affects reallocation within already allocated rewards. For example if today, someone wants to change the amount of allocation DFI-per-block for community fund, then yes, that would fall under reallocation of block rewards, and would therefore require 500 DFI. Hope this clarifies. |
|
ignmessage 8P24qRzccs9FJXkqrrzPZGa2aNXxqBkrmb "dfip-2208-b-yes" |
signmessage 8cXiD6ye5SPy1EqUF7PiyqQsWsJs5mtMuJ dfip-2208-b-yes |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8MXn7LR75PA8dFny44d1aJHU41LudvA5YP dfip-2208-b-yes |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8Zg2ohcLuvCpotCu7SmEDdksdxEaMKZrKP "dfip-2208-b-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8WrWAoAxiVunh8myGioaCEyRa4jT9eXzhX "dfip-2208-b-yes" |
signmessage 8Yv2DLTc8Yu8VV3ypC58V26wmRnJ7D6YuB "dfip-2208-b-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8Zgjtp5UfoRhyF4X7cMUPHUw462wJLRQ7k "dfip-2208-b-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8H6fv2NtJQ9Q559rXjkzdZkMceQzdKgyTo "dfip-2208-b-no" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8UYTLFLKx8gQ5KCkQfebLGULt7UeYY5xie "dfip-2208-b-no" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8GGvTvVRkWnsnXzQhMgw7dKQhuS3nSMgiw "dfip-2208-b-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8SuT1zu4NyPXcVE5MrPpTDNNC2urvb63qD "dfip-2208-b-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8GVvJb4DeD2du6LtRuuurApoGrrUDsidJL "dfip-2208-b-no" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8JQgeF5rCqLkEoiSsW7f5Eb7z6CgucY7Nj "dfip-2208-b-no" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8TNXjkrxucbByZL2uqWV7rSWmcuek3Jxeh "dfip-2208-b-no" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8ap2nRBnB2TMajneshsCrSHj46otNxZCrt "dfip-2208-b-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8G2w2AWFcVrnemPrDBN5gGfB5Wkh7VtNKo "dfip-2208-b-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8ZQSD1W9zPuS5yP6jw6VeWRL51EwZe6wjk "dfip-2208-b-no" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8G5f9wYGiTULo9hb1UW1MyrEgbWJWNcTa7 "dfip-2208-b-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8NUNAyzenPZBjCfZZt9UN5ZgAcAHJtSQwh "dfip-2208-b-neutral" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8QsJGXwm2QYwtqwWgJeEHyEcRcqcmBktBb "dfip-2208-b-no" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8V9cHUYsXvzz2neMSFAFL8MfvyMkx78ugp "dfip-2208-b-no" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8Ugpq2QZwwSjQRnKscnFB1cmrUP2euh8NF "dfip-2208-b-no" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8UiVMtfPTXzVujhgBkrMYmW9NbpHtxL4b1 "dfip-2208-b-no" |
defi-cli signmessage "8UsgQBnNpjvjGoearXfXaVX6MNRxfdLGuK" "dfip-2208-b-no" |
defi-cli signmessage 8Lb2YBdFHTbioN1e3RGf1Vvprrj7da8Srs DFIP-2208-B-No INQUMZYJxo9GNzJUIDL5DQfaEQEWvL/bk1u8cURBcbHRS2+mHM/nhK3sieX/zewgI70+DHOYbKvFgKS72vWmyls= |
defi-cli signmessage 8dJLcKddBnwXzzXBLeZLYqzHehfeB8UWa2 "dfip-2208-B-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8abBgv8y8G1aCV5hwkfWQVG2h7JJKXHk3P "dfip-2208-b-no" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8MtLbT2sqST1J9rPWJ5y4P3DdFW9gyh934 "dfip-2208-b-no" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8eCQsyuVQNktcmKwFLRoPY28249kgbicmV "dfip-2208-b-no" |
defi-cli signmessage 8ZazLdqc7T5au7jgUDhj2YYP2BKzEzcWNL "dfip-2208-B-yes" |
defi-cli signmessage "8RDADmNR1C9zSoyxg1RRn7dBDYc23svxGC" "dfip-2208-b-no" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8R8e2JwXhoqaFAqbMLHBwAGtHAgZ47RCYF "dfip-2208-b-no" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8JahBhn8hjaYjy4bwiW5mK8f6gaJkPCjLG "dfip-2208-b-no" |
signmessage 8daGYPTDTzMRtUx61uWRjg7p9GECMjuip8 "cfp-2208-a-no" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8YBcHsAMiQkVSdmRutroDJYzhmk7XfPrme "dfip-2208-b-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8RFbyGmX7A5Vi7ezCEsg2BhsNKncQb67xh "dfip-2208-b-no" |
signmessage 8Mc75kd1xBaEXJfVwcoW6vnjpGqGAWB7EJ "dfip-2208-b-no" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8Mc75kd1xBaEXJfVwcoW6vnjpGqGAWB7EJ "dfip-2208-b-no" |
signmessage 8X9mSBVoeFfsk7XyAJmYCGu4SgrQzMj7Ud “dfip-2208-b-neutral“ signmessage 8K5EUbUbdpRWH1Tx1tTSpJgXs1x8Bck5vN “dfip-2208-b-neutral“ signmessage 8SQaHvzkrHik3o9vwF1MdKf2LkdgcicNTD “dfip-2208-b-neutral“ signmessage 8cfqCfRmN697jMavNmgbJH61tRXNhBXCiM “dfip-2208-b-neutral“ signmessage 8c3Rdmz1hCSvvSRittYUYQtQQLurX8dzzQ “dfip-2208-b-neutral“ signmessage 8F8fVhgSHs71NUFvEmhVeYatzayo6YQ1Zw “dfip-2208-b-neutral“ signmessage 8WnUuKZ7U55HNxmnwZMwzJHggRSy1ZKUKs “dfip-2208-b-neutral“ signmessage 8XFTnhwwbyM3MA7jLosmiupJfzKvuC8XM8 “dfip-2208-b-neutral“ signmessage 8LiEQLQCLkv2eTcQ5vmMWszMCXEYBk9GK3 “dfip-2208-b-neutral“ signmessage 8YfZo7Qow2G6aZFWAzEoWAvxufA7AyYb4i “dfip-2208-b-neutral“ |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8LQE1MbVTd2NLyUmxQVdjAc7A3qcpnjbFB "dfip-2208-b-no" |
signmessage 8XjGQuumUBGyevsG8Jn4yZQ6QBpkA4ukgM "dfip-2208-b-no" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8cfzcwpwgwtYJAmgpVhRsU8G1YLTdbFCsv "dfip-2208-b-no" |
signmessage 8Na88Ha7bbySMwQR1TjExB6iu4nSAJ6wy3 "DFIP-2208-B-yes" |
defi-cli signmessage 8JcvCqCPJ5ZsaWNhedB4NvxU6nVzCtdHiB "DFIP-2208-B-no" |
signmessage 8XJ4TUFpZNTZBSMJtP4Zam4gDMv9nXajB1 "DFIP-2208-B-no" |
Votes of the DFX Community Individual votes can be viewed transparently here: Votes: |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8FzR1vtCgqp7moFnATtptcSZbgsRhsQjnz "dfip-2208-b-no" |
mnstate_validate.log |
DFIP Overview
This proposal: https://www.reddit.com/r/defiblockchain/comments/wsdjjy/dfip_move_further_rewards_from_dusddfi_to/
Based on:
https://www.reddit.com/r/defiblockchain/comments/vlsgxx/dfip_introducing_usdtdusd_and_usdcdusd_for_a/
https://www.reddit.com/r/defiblockchain/comments/wjaonw/one_more_idea_dryout_the_dusddfi_pool/
Describe your proposal
As a follow-up to DFIP-2207-B, i propose to move more rewards from the DUSD-DFI to the USDT-DUSD / USDC-DUSD pools.
The final reward distribution of DFIP-2207-B is:
10% for USDT-DUSD (7,5 % at the time of writing)
10% for USDC-DUSD (7,5 % at the time of writing)
30% for DUSD-DFI (35 % at the time of writing)
I propose to extend DFIP-2207-B to these final distribution:
15% for USDT-DUSD
15% for USDC-DUSD
20% for DUSD-DFI
with a weekly adjustment of 1,5% every friday at about 12:00 UTC
After the final distribution is achieved, further evaluation of the reward distribution should be done.
How does this DFIP benefit the DeFiChain community?
DUSD DEX prices at the time of writing:
DUSD in DFI: 0.8194 DFI (DFI: 0.8055 USD) => 0,66 USD
DUSD in USDT: 0.8206
DUSD in USDC: 0.7911
These prices shows that the assumption of DFIP-2207-B was correct, but can be further improved for a long time stabilization of the DUSD Price by helping to shrink the DUSD-DFI Pool
Non-obligation
I understand that vote of confidence for DFIP carries no obligations by any developers to implement the proposals. DeFiChain is a community projects. Pull requests can be submitted by community and reserved to be evaluated for safety and general community acceptance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: