-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DFIP-2207-C: Deactivation of DFI burn to payback DUSD loan & activation condition of DFI->DUSD future swap #191
Comments
absolute no brainer - if this doesn't get approved, all the other dfips for dusd work against each other. |
This must be approved in the current situation. Let me explain what will happen without deactivation.
Without the Futures swap
|
|
|
signmessage 8VqHKJmGVPxDj2gZyD4cMnE5AvjrKPBgT6 "DFIP-2207-C-yes" |
thx uzyn for putting this up. very important to get this approved! |
signmessage 8RJM58PhPWKy8ufcbHwtxHLrByEyCM5Pey dfip-2207-c-yes |
This DFIP is a big mistake: With this one, the dUSD is going to 60% - 80 % premium.... during months. Do you think that 60%-80% premium is better than 20% discount ?? |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8MXn7LR75PA8dFny44d1aJHU41LudvA5YP dfip-2207-c-no |
signmessage 8RNwLywUm8BHY1RqjdaZ9SaaurTLWFSJbx dfip-2207-C-yes |
signmessage 8REfG2L75fS3nCBaUwKbEbMAvxVxuxj3Bi dfip-2207-C-yes |
This will not happen. As soon as premium is >42% you can sell DUSD basically for free. This will burn more DUSD, bring down the stabilization fees and lower down the premium. |
From my point of view, right now, the premium hard cap should be 80% (50% minimum vault liquidation ratio + 30% current stabilization fee): See: https://www.reddit.com/r/defiblockchain/comments/vua975/how_the_dusd_premium_can_be_reduced/ |
signmessage 8P24qRzccs9FJXkqrrzPZGa2aNXxqBkrmb "DFIP-2207-C-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8H8e5xeWTNDgZCA2K3CqL6Bn6zNRmxhSgD "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8UzEFxqm2zxqLDZHCREVsmS5FuF6gNj6Bb "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8HHrgiS6DhEiAF4nAgeHJsb13R4XhofzXZ "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8YguVctxD5ZEomJXaTwdYT1NYEUhjb28oN "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8ZAF9MJjecV3m15HZpubNe1kq9ro4qPa66 "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8KjUPb4vxV4d7q4puagqUJ6yxDTb8xCeAa "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8beEBtnkbnafafcBKNiBxWvsx5rnK32DWW "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
defi-cli signmessage 8Wk9Yfeyd7C4Nh6FTs6tmGobhBmPzmhmFM "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8RAtNT4iLhFTX7Sb5CKKwB1KcqtMdVqaFE "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8TagioKMQ8sjSuJmCbaab8d7MScYHJtXJk "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
defi-cli signmessage 8daGYPTDTzMRtUx61uWRjg7p9GECMjuip8 "CFP-2207-C-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8PK3nzRggYsZhV4EvqT6r3zvFDAUPRZDMW "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
signmessage 8XfjUN9asrYD25ftg5uLmcMHRve8QN5pD4 dfip-2207-c-yes |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8MCZXAe21DsUj7fPuzZMe1WzgU9QbCkk1k "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8Nc3F3DorLEmnVJ6iyRzRPztGjLJ85tHzD "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8bz6BkV67rfwXUqWAv8uKcH6JdKX3WykVX "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8ciHLMKKXczEzxnkjYZrh1DwbbJSGNoWAH "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8FcbBifdaKW8baTYjKQWfYxpCBTFr1pjne "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8PzQHd6JrDnVxuWwmjJe2TmGqSDsSL3Ywu "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8HxarRW6MeqSGGMYiHP8mFsuhM5zyzHaxS "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
defi-cli signmessage "8UsgQBnNpjvjGoearXfXaVX6MNRxfdLGuK" "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8Z4PcpkW39611Hcu9fbxuSVo46Y1WJeBpT "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8dXgX2qd82eyF4qRUhanypMTrcvVf86rVN "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
signmessage 8ZXoChtTZoGWwdt9E9cLzvx8FEuYVL6Trg "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8YBcHsAMiQkVSdmRutroDJYzhmk7XfPrme "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
defi-cli signmessage 8JcvCqCPJ5ZsaWNhedB4NvxU6nVzCtdHiB "DFIP-2207-C-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8d8N1PBFFvG6fsDq72bP6PXC2JZZHWoNKe "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
defi-cli signmessage "8Rqu842qDGAVd63TMxqqkEvsVCmr16UU6U" "dfip-2207-c-neutral" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8QVHXw3TvwPFprPERG1jpDpR6U5YoLjApX "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8HT6qknYpb1M43i6hqB9t3SC1XotaMxtDT "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8Lq2t6JHtvNfhPUoE7csuQmhDkSF1EuCNT "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
signmessage 8QaLNFpB9fgYxu1zhEmLywkGiaJGnAQnJW "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
signmessage 8XjGQuumUBGyevsG8Jn4yZQ6QBpkA4ukgM dfip-2207-c-yes |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8UPKznKGkqam9nN5VMEDeU242ueQfwmLJJ "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
easi vote! $ defi-cli signmessage 8Vm9Xt1pB7vzkJdCaJihT4rKKMjmLkdUDC "dfip-2207-c-yes" |
$ defi-cli signmessage 8RLGUA8T7GX5xKGQ56VtoJH9gd8DdCUthL "dfip-2207-c-neutral" |
signmessage 8doBDqvnPdfcHHjDBk1AqdywwaUNf8WgxS "cfp-2207-c-neutral" |
mnstate_validate.log |
DFIP Overview
b11f9f9fd8eeb2bb994b96e1325c5ac7e1c759291d21684f95f5c53204c5d5ea
Describe your proposal
Following the requests and discussions raised by the community, this DFIP is to allow masternodes a vote that DFI burn to payback DUSD loan is disabled following the improvements made in the special voting round of DFIP-2206 to address the DUSD situation.
This proposal specifically request that:
How does this DFIP benefit the DeFiChain community?
This goes along with the other DFIPs on DUSD and helps to bring DUSD to the intended goal of being 50% loan-backed.
Non-obligation
I understand that vote of confidence for DFIP carries no obligations by any developers to implement the proposals. DeFiChain is a community projects. Pull requests can be submitted by community and reserved to be evaluated for safety and general community acceptance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: