You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For each masternode an additional address can be defined, which can cast the vote in the name of this masternode. Possibly one can give also several votes on an address to be able to summarize Masternodes
Why is this needed:
By the introduction of the possibility to redirect his Masternoderewards to another wallet address it will be possible to move the owner address from the active wallet e.g. in a physical safe. However, to participate in the voting it is mandatory to keep the owner address active in his wallet. With a possible DFI/USD price $50 in the future, one then has $400,000 exposed to risk.
In order not to be exposed to this risk and to keep the number of participants in the voting high, the above proposal is made for this reason.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@bernd-mack: Thanks for opening an issue, it is currently awaiting triage.
The triage/accepted label can be added by foundation members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.
Details
I am a bot created to help the DeFiCh developers manage community feedback and contributions. You can check out my manifest file to understand my behavior and what I can do. If you want to use this for your project, you can check out the DeFiCh/oss-governance-bot repository.
What would you like to be added:
For each masternode an additional address can be defined, which can cast the vote in the name of this masternode. Possibly one can give also several votes on an address to be able to summarize Masternodes
Why is this needed:
By the introduction of the possibility to redirect his Masternoderewards to another wallet address it will be possible to move the owner address from the active wallet e.g. in a physical safe. However, to participate in the voting it is mandatory to keep the owner address active in his wallet. With a possible DFI/USD price $50 in the future, one then has $400,000 exposed to risk.
In order not to be exposed to this risk and to keep the number of participants in the voting high, the above proposal is made for this reason.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: