Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce nonlinearity more naturally #72

Open
DanielSank opened this issue Aug 4, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Introduce nonlinearity more naturally #72

DanielSank opened this issue Aug 4, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@DanielSank
Copy link
Owner

Section 3.1 goes from the linear to nonlinear case without warning. We need to state what we're doing there. There are two places in particular where we can do this:

  1. "Now in the quantum mechanical case...on resonance with one particular transition ... and far off resonance from any other transition" We should explain that this condition requires anharmonicity.

  2. Also in the introduction of the raising/lowering operator restriction to the 2-level space, we can be more explicit.

@DanielSank DanielSank added the bug label Aug 4, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant