-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider mirroring the repos to Codeberg #712
Comments
Although I have a history of doing CI/CD mirroring to various Git sites, and that I could on paper do the same for Codeberg: Adblock list repos are the most bandwidth-intensive projects on Git sites by far (Especially if I were to list a Codeberg URL in uBlock Origin's assets.json), and I have my doubts as to whether the owner(s) of Codeberg would be prepared for such a massive bandwidth rate increase. I've also had individual projects be disabled on small sites before due to taking too much bandwitch (repo.or.cz) or due to site dev incompetence (NotABug). |
Oh.. I think you should directly ask https://docs.codeberg.org/contact/ about if they are ready for massive bandwidth rate increase. |
As a result of the following aspects, I have decided to treat it as a wontfix for the next few months:
I don't rule out that I may revisit this in the future, however, after I realised that Codeberg (and GitLab) support IPv6 while GitHub doesn't. Additionally, who knows what kind of odd changes GitLab would do to its "GitLab for Open Source Program" in the future that'd make GL unusable and necessitate a move of some kind. |
BTW, I wrote a separate repo about this: https://codeberg.org/Recommendations/Mirror_to_Codeberg |
Hello @DandelionSprout I have sent you an email but now I decided to make an issue with my throwaway account
📢 The Shortcoming
Here are some sources for you:
🔬 Describe the solution you'd like
I believe you should mirror your repos to Codeberg
ℹ️ FAQ
Q: - GitHub Actions -- this is a huge time saver for me
- Forcing all contributors to modify their current setup and move to another hosting -- we may just lose contributors in the end
A: As I said, we only just mirror. The repo will be available and contributable on both sites.
Q: - Transferring issues -- is this possible? Issues here represent a technical knowledge base we can't live without
- Transferring wiki and all edit history -- possible?
A: Yes, it is possible.
a. Example for issues:
b. Example for commits:
c. Example for wiki:
Q: Despite having mirror/s, the project will still continue to be operated from GitHub for development, so having yet another mirror doesn't solve anything.
A: You can create issues, contribute, view the repos on there without going to GitHub! Example:
Q: How does Codeberg mirror comments from GitHub?
A: It uses Access Token.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: