Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 19, 2024. It is now read-only.

Add DPG: Open Terms Archive #638

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

nathanbaleeta
Copy link
Contributor

Add DPG: Open Terms Archive

@nathanbaleeta
Copy link
Contributor Author

Follow-up: The repository shared has been archived by the owner. It is now read-only. Will confirm with the contact person if there is another active one available. Thanks.

@MattiSG
Copy link

MattiSG commented Jul 19, 2022

Hey @nathanbaleeta! I don't see the linked repo in the JSON file this PR intends to add, so I don't know where to update it 🙂

The repository for Open Terms Archive Core code is https://github.com/ambanum/OpenTermsArchive/ and will soon migrate to the @OpenTermsArchive organisation, where you will find all the other repositories.

I also understand that one of the blocking questions was the one of licensing.
The Core code is licensed under EUPL v1.2, the file declarations are either under AUPL v1.2 or AGPL v3 (depending on the partner managing them), and the resulting dataset are published under ODbL.

@nathanbaleeta
Copy link
Contributor Author

nathanbaleeta commented Jul 19, 2022

Hey @nathanbaleeta! I don't see the linked repo in the JSON file this PR intends to add, so I don't know where to update it slightly_smiling_face

The repository for Open Terms Archive Core code is https://github.com/ambanum/OpenTermsArchive/ and will soon migrate to the @OpenTermsArchive organisation, where you will find all the other repositories.

I also understand that one of the blocking questions was the one of licensing. The Core code is licensed under EUPL v1.2, the file declarations are either under AUPL v1.2 or AGPL v3 (depending on the partner managing them), and the resulting dataset are published under ODbL.

@MattiSG Thank you for sharing the correct repo and appropriate licensing. I have updated the necessary files on your behalf and will integrate them into the registry after the review is completed. Thanks.

@MattiSG
Copy link

MattiSG commented Jul 19, 2022

Thanks @nathanbaleeta for your quick adjustments!
What's interesting with Open Terms Archive is that it is both a series of datasets and the engine that generates those datasets. How should we reference this in the DPGA registry? 🙂

@nathanbaleeta
Copy link
Contributor Author

nathanbaleeta commented Jul 19, 2022

Thanks @nathanbaleeta for your quick adjustments! What's interesting with Open Terms Archive is that it is both a series of datasets and the engine that generates those datasets. How should we reference this in the DPGA registry? slightly_smiling_face

@MattiSG we would be happy to nominate Open Terms Archive under both open-source software and open data categories. Kindly share a link that explicitly mentions an approved open data license for this change to be valid. For Open Data, we only accept conformant licenses to the Open Definition from the Open Data Commons. Thanks.

@nathanbaleeta
Copy link
Contributor Author

nathanbaleeta commented Jul 19, 2022

Checklist for conducting technical review against DPG Standard:

  • Clear Ownership
  • Platform Independence
  • Documentation
  • Mechanism For Extracting Data
  • Do No Harm By Design
  • Data Privacy & Security
  • Adherence to Standards & Best Practices
  • Adherence to Privacy and Applicable Laws
  • Inappropriate & Illegal Content
  • Protection From Harassment
  • Development & deployment countries

@MattiSG
Copy link

MattiSG commented Jul 19, 2022

@nathanbaleeta
Copy link
Contributor Author

nathanbaleeta commented Jul 19, 2022

Our datasets are distributed across a growing number of repositories and are not consolidated yet. You can find them, and their ODbL license files in the ZIP file, on:

@MattiSG Thanks for sharing the data repositories. I would suggest we have them first consolidated before we adding the open data category to this submission for better organization. Kindly let us know when thats complete and we shall update the entry ASAP. Thanks.

@nathanbaleeta nathanbaleeta added the Support Applications that need additional support from the review team label Aug 10, 2022
@nathanbaleeta
Copy link
Contributor Author

Digital solutions that are no longer active, or do not provide the required documentation needed for review, will be removed from the DPG Registry as per the archiving policy.

@nathanbaleeta nathanbaleeta removed the Support Applications that need additional support from the review team label Aug 23, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants