Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 10, 2020. It is now read-only.

State page year selector design #1582

Closed
2 tasks done
ericronne opened this issue Jul 8, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

State page year selector design #1582

ericronne opened this issue Jul 8, 2016 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ericronne
Copy link
Contributor

ericronne commented Jul 8, 2016

The current design of interactive-data modules on the states page includes a selector, which defaults to the most-recent year for which we have data (2013 in the example below). Since the year is always different from the current year (2016), this has caused some confusion in our armchair usability testing sessions.

image

One potential solution is to include the non-data years in the selector, but treat them differently....
image

These non-data years could perhaps be clickable. If one was selected, an explanation of why we have no data could appear in the chart area.

  • Create a prototype
  • Test it
@ericronne ericronne added this to the Sprint-CozyCuscus milestone Jul 8, 2016
@ericronne ericronne self-assigned this Jul 8, 2016
@ericronne
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ericronne
Copy link
Contributor Author

selector

@ericronne
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coreycaitlin @meiqimichelle

Will this design for the "no data" years give us problems with some categories, since we may have 2012 data for federal coal in Utah, eg, but not have any 2012 data for federal biomass in Utah?

hrumph.

@ericronne
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok after chatting with @meiqimichelle, this "no data" approach may work after all (but we will have to explain some of the oddball situations in the copy, @coreycaitlin). Here's a modified gif, where i've instead grayed out the charts for non-data years. That way we won't have to worry about the page getting longer and shorter. NOTE: this design is old, but updating for the prototype would be time consuming.

Will do a quick test or two...

cc @gemfarmer

selector

@ericronne
Copy link
Contributor Author

Did two quick tests on the selector; both people grokked it immediately. Also tested the bar chart interaction and a couple other state-page elements with one of the users. All in the ever-growing test-notes doc

Implement-able @meiqimichelle?

@meiqimichelle
Copy link
Contributor

I believe @shawnbot and @gemfarmer may have started working on the selector yesterday, yays -- tracked in #1588

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants