CSIP114 conflicts with its examples

[koit]

CSIP114 requires the presence of one or more mets/fileSec/fileGrp/@USE attributes with the value "Representations," i.e.:

USE="Representations"

However, the examples use more detailed values, e.g.:

USE="Representations/submission/data"
USE="Representations/preingest"
USE="Representations/submission"
USE="Representations/ingest"

Either the requirement text or the examples need to be changed.

[karinbredenberg]

Looks like there are text gone missing. The use starts with representations and the folder of what it is is given. But we cant put the rest of the value in the requirement just the start. Textual update will come in the next version.

[hsilva-keep]

@karinbredenberg All structMap representation LABEL related requirements have the same problem (CSIP101-CSIP104 and CSIP119).

So, the ideia is to assume that in both cases the logic is the same: the value starts with "Representations" and the whole value should be the path to the representation or representation data (like CSIP64 mentions)? Because if so, that logic colides with CSIPSTR13, which states that the folder name is "representation" (vs. "Representation").

(just for future reference, this is related to a previous issue I've raised, #555)

[karinbredenberg]

CSIP101-104 and CSIP119 are relating to the package where no representations are present. In that case all file groups for the content being delivered the data is placed in one div in the structMap.

CSIP114 and CSIP107 have gotten a clarification for the use of the folder path following the value "Representations".

[karinbredenberg]

Closed with PR #683