Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unclear description for 'passive interaction' aspect option #312

Open
met4000 opened this issue Nov 26, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Unclear description for 'passive interaction' aspect option #312

met4000 opened this issue Nov 26, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@met4000
Copy link

met4000 commented Nov 26, 2024

Issue type:

  • ➕ Feature request

Short description:

From testing, the current 'passive interaction' aspect option allows things to pull from exporters and push into importers (so long as the aspect allows it) - see also #311.

The current in-game description of this aspect option is unclear; it can be read to say that enabling it will allow both importers and exporters to be both pushed and pulled from, rather than just pushing for importers and just pulling for exporters. It also does not mention that the pushing/pulling can only occur for items that satisfy the current aspect config.
image

If #311 is not accepted (which would likely require redoing the aspect option and/or description anyways if accepted), could the description for the passive interaction aspect option be modified to include only pushing or pulling will work, and optionally mention something about passive interaction respecting the aspect config?

E.g.: "If the target may insert into the network." on importers and "If the target may extract from the network." on exporters, or "If the target may insert into this importer or extract from this exporter, respecting any aspect configurations." on both.

@rubensworks
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the suggestion!

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Options in Features Nov 26, 2024
@rubensworks rubensworks moved this from Options to Accepted (To Do) in Features Nov 26, 2024
@Jack-McKalling
Copy link
Contributor

Another alternative description could be:

If the target may actively feed items on top of the existing insertion/extraction, respecting the aspect settings and transfer direction.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Accepted (To Do)
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants