Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tests: test for security issues with bandit #609

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jkowalleck
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@jkowalleck jkowalleck added QA Quality Assurance CT Continuous Testing labels Oct 25, 2023
@jkowalleck jkowalleck requested a review from a team as a code owner October 25, 2023 18:31
@jkowalleck jkowalleck merged commit d008737 into dev/4.0.0 Oct 25, 2023
23 checks passed
@jkowalleck jkowalleck deleted the tests/bandit-tool branch October 25, 2023 18:35
@jkowalleck jkowalleck added this to the 4.0.0 milestone Oct 25, 2023
@codacy-production
Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
Report missing for 2bc7cb11
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (2bc7cb1) Report Missing Report Missing Report Missing
Head commit (eb2758e) 523 325 62.14%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#609) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Footnotes

  1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CT Continuous Testing QA Quality Assurance
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant