-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Supress welcome tab - clean option with resource #2159
Comments
My users pointed out that in some cases startup could take a very long time if the application was shut down with a large number of OPIs open. Hence the One could argue that using |
Instead of all these negative options like no memento, delete memento, no welcome, ... and then adding a -resource to open what you want, why not start that way with the already existing options? |
Sure,
Sorry, I may have created a bit of an x-y problem here. I'll explain what I want in the end: phoebus *.opi I can make that work by creating our own launcher. But launching the GUI application invariably brings back the Welcome tab. So saving a specific layout doesn't really work for me, because it will always be different. Unless Phoebus would identify an explicitly loaded empty layout as such and not add the welcome tab. |
In the interest of minimizing the need for new options, how about this:
That's all already in place except for suppressing the Welcome for an empty layout. Doing that would be a change in behavior, but I think it'll be universally accepted. |
That would work fine for me. I could also take a look at implementing it. |
Can this be closed? |
Yes, closed with #2184 |
I would like to pass a resource to phoebus and open just that. Not the welcome tab, not whatever was in the memento.
If I pass an empty layout (to override the memento) and a resource, I still get the welcome tab.
The
-clean
option, in addtion to ignoring the memento and supressing the welcome tab, also ignores any resources.Is there a workaround I haven't found yet?
To me the
-clean
option would be much more useful, if it would not ignore resources, apps etc. Afterall, I am in direct control of what I pass on the command line. So, if don't want it to open a resource I don't pass it.I am happy to make a PR, but since this behavior is explicitly described, I assume there is some reason behind it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: