You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some data holders are creating resource identifiers (e.g. account_id, transaction_id, client_id) in the hundreds of characters. We have seen resource IDs of well over a thousand characters and have even seen signed JWTs as account_id values. To us, this seems unnecessary and results in problems for recipient storage systems such as hitting column size limits, index character limits and index performance issues. We don't see a good reason why these resource IDs need to be this large.
Intention and Value of Change
The intention of the change is to ensure that resource identifiers meet ID permanence requirements while also being of sensible size so as to not negatively impact downstream recipient systems.
Consult with the community on the number of characters required to meet ID permanence requirements and enforce that as a size limit through the ID permanence standards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
Some data holders are creating resource identifiers (e.g. account_id, transaction_id, client_id) in the hundreds of characters. We have seen resource IDs of well over a thousand characters and have even seen signed JWTs as account_id values. To us, this seems unnecessary and results in problems for recipient storage systems such as hitting column size limits, index character limits and index performance issues. We don't see a good reason why these resource IDs need to be this large.
Intention and Value of Change
The intention of the change is to ensure that resource identifiers meet ID permanence requirements while also being of sensible size so as to not negatively impact downstream recipient systems.
Area Affected
https://consumerdatastandardsaustralia.github.io/standards/#id-permanence
Change Proposed
Consult with the community on the number of characters required to meet ID permanence requirements and enforce that as a size limit through the ID permanence standards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: