Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multiple Credit Card Account & Loan Support #62

Closed
perlboy opened this issue Dec 11, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Multiple Credit Card Account & Loan Support #62

perlboy opened this issue Dec 11, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@perlboy
Copy link

perlboy commented Dec 11, 2019

Description

Following release to the Slate site of V1.1.0 yesterday we have now initiated analysis of changes using the diff previously provided in #56.

With reference to slate/source/includes/swagger/cds_full.json line 2528 we note the implementation of #9 resulting in a payload structure of:

      "termDeposit" : {
        "type" : "array",
        "items" : {
          "$ref" : "#/definitions/BankingTermDepositAccount"
        }
      },
      "creditCard" : {
        "$ref" : "#/definitions/BankingCreditCardAccount"
      },
      "loan" : {
        "$ref" : "#/definitions/BankingLoanAccount"
      },

We have identified use cases where accounts have multiple separate card accounts and banking loan accounts included within them. Notable implementations of this are products focused on the agricultural sector known as "all in one" accounts. This structure is typically used where an overall account is used to manage a family business risk and sub accounts are used to provide consumer flexibility.

Area Affected

BankingAccountDetail

Change Proposed

We propose the conversion of credit card and loan account types to an array as well.

@perlboy
Copy link
Author

perlboy commented May 1, 2020

Preamble: Biza currently has 42 open issues within Standards Maintenance. In an effort to optimise our own backlog we are closing those which have no actual response from the DSB. They may be reopened at a later time or referenced when the issues are highlighted by third parties.

No response has been received on this and the DSB does not appear to have shown interest in resolving it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants