Add support for injecting request executor in the runtime tool

[angrybayblade]

Important

Add support for injecting a request executor in the runtime tool by modifying runtime.py and toolset.py.

• Behavior:
  • Add execute_request argument in _build_executable_from_args() in runtime.py to inject request executor.
  • Modify execute_action() in toolset.py to include toolset instance in metadata for request execution.
• Functions:
  • Add execute_request function in execute() in runtime.py to handle endpoint, method, body, and parameters.
• Misc:
  • Import CustomAuthParameter in runtime.py for request execution.
  • Remove unused variable build_logs in test_benchmark.py.
  • Add apt update before installing dependencies in Dockerfile.

^{This description was created by for 3b8abbf. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
composio	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Nov 24, 2024 3:41pm

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 1c14d98 in 18 seconds

More details

• Looked at 82 lines of code in 2 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. python/composio/tools/base/runtime.py:376

• Draft comment:
  The request_executor flag is set but not used in the execute function. Ensure that the logic for handling execute_request is correctly implemented.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful.

Workflow ID: wflow_w9K6eQTWAgbeTtuj

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[github-actions]

This comment was generated by github-actions[bot]!

JS SDK Coverage Report

📊 Coverage report for JS SDK can be found at the following URL:
https://pub-92e668239ab84bfd80ee07d61e9d2f40.r2.dev/coverage-11997473172/coverage/index.html

📁 Test report folder can be found at the following URL:
https://pub-92e668239ab84bfd80ee07d61e9d2f40.r2.dev/html-report-11997473172/html-report/report.html

[shreysingla11]

Code Review Summary

The changes look well-structured and maintain good coding practices. Here's a summary of the review:

Strengths:

• Clean implementation of request executor injection
• Proper type hints and parameter validation
• Good error handling in execute_request method
• Clear documentation in docstrings

Suggested Improvements:

1. Documentation:

   • Add docstring for execute_request function
   • Document potential exceptions
   • Add return type hints

2. Error Handling:

   • Add input validation for endpoint and method
   • Add error handling around request execution
   • Add logging for failed requests

3. Type Safety:

   • Add runtime type checking for toolset cast
   • Consider using TypeGuard for better type safety

4. Security:

   • Add request validation/sanitization
   • Consider adding request rate limiting
   • Add logging for failed auth attempts

Overall, the code is well-written but could benefit from additional error handling and documentation improvements. The changes maintain the existing code quality standards while adding useful functionality.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 3b8abbf in 40 seconds

More details

• Looked at 125 lines of code in 5 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. python/composio/tools/env/base.py:322

• Draft comment:
  You can simplify the code by using metadata.pop("_toolset", None) directly instead of assigning it to _. This pattern is also present in toolset.py at line 470.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The code in runtime.py and toolset.py has a repeated pattern of checking for the presence of a key in a dictionary and then popping it. This can be optimized by using the pop method directly with a default value.

2. python/composio/tools/toolset.py:468

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding exception handling around the request execution to handle potential errors gracefully.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was on unchanged code.

3. python/swe/tests/test_benchmark.py:35

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding exception handling around the Docker image build process to handle potential errors gracefully.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Marked as duplicate.

Workflow ID: wflow_kWV7MMor13Lk7fR1

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.