Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A type data structure can be use for PDA or Non-PDA accounts #26

Open
JazielGuerrero opened this issue Sep 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels
Done This has been merged to develop Enhancement This improve the product or Código's source code Usability This is an enhancement on the product usage

Comments

@JazielGuerrero
Copy link
Collaborator

JazielGuerrero commented Sep 1, 2023

Describe the issue
When defining a type in the CIDL, this will get transpile to a Non-PDA or a PDA account. However, it is possible to use the same structure in different types of accounts.

Expected behavior
Specify in a given instruction if the type needs to transpile to a PDA or a Non-PDA account.

Reported in issue: #8

@JazielGuerrero JazielGuerrero added the Triage This item needs to be prioritize label Sep 1, 2023
@JazielGuerrero JazielGuerrero self-assigned this Sep 1, 2023
@JazielGuerrero JazielGuerrero added the Enhancement This improve the product or Código's source code label Sep 1, 2023
@JazielGuerrero JazielGuerrero added todo and removed todo labels Sep 2, 2023
@JazielGuerrero JazielGuerrero added In progress This is actively being worked on Usability This is an enhancement on the product usage and removed Triage This item needs to be prioritize labels Dec 5, 2023
@JazielGuerrero JazielGuerrero added Done This has been merged to develop and removed In progress This is actively being worked on labels Feb 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Done This has been merged to develop Enhancement This improve the product or Código's source code Usability This is an enhancement on the product usage
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant