You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 6, 2024. It is now read-only.
I recently concatenated hundreds of nuclear loci (~500), and I ran iqtree using
iqtree2 -s myalignment.fasta -Q partitions.txt -T AUTO -m TEST -B 5000
and apparently got 100bs values for all my relationships - which is not concordant with my previous Astral species tree, nor with a preliminary iqtree ran missing "-Q partitions.txt". How does that argument is working on my data? I know bootstraps are super estimated when we know that some datasets can have a lot of gene tree discordances on some backbone topologies and still get 100 bs values, but is this value from -Q reliable? On the .log file, it is written the following files (below), is there some more appropriate to check bs support? Thank you all.
Analysis results written to:
IQ-TREE report: partitions.txt.iqtree
Maximum-likelihood tree: partitions.txt.treefile
Partition trees: partitions.txt.parttrees
Likelihood distances: partitions.txt.mldist
Best partitioning scheme: partitions.txt.best_scheme.nex
in RAxML format: partitions.txt.best_scheme
Ultrafast bootstrap approximation results written to:
Split support values: partitions.txt.splits.nex
Consensus tree: partitions.txt.contree
Screen log file: partitions.txt.log
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Dear all,
I recently concatenated hundreds of nuclear loci (~500), and I ran iqtree using
iqtree2 -s myalignment.fasta -Q partitions.txt -T AUTO -m TEST -B 5000
and apparently got 100bs values for all my relationships - which is not concordant with my previous Astral species tree, nor with a preliminary iqtree ran missing "-Q partitions.txt". How does that argument is working on my data? I know bootstraps are super estimated when we know that some datasets can have a lot of gene tree discordances on some backbone topologies and still get 100 bs values, but is this value from -Q reliable? On the .log file, it is written the following files (below), is there some more appropriate to check bs support? Thank you all.
Analysis results written to:
IQ-TREE report: partitions.txt.iqtree
Maximum-likelihood tree: partitions.txt.treefile
Partition trees: partitions.txt.parttrees
Likelihood distances: partitions.txt.mldist
Best partitioning scheme: partitions.txt.best_scheme.nex
in RAxML format: partitions.txt.best_scheme
Ultrafast bootstrap approximation results written to:
Split support values: partitions.txt.splits.nex
Consensus tree: partitions.txt.contree
Screen log file: partitions.txt.log
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: