-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 292
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: implement SingleAttestation #7126
base: devnet-5
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Performance Report✔️ no performance regression detected Full benchmark results
|
3dc37df
to
af6f7e1
Compare
Closing as the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM - should clean up remaining TODOs before merging
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## unstable #7126 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 49.08% 49.01% -0.08%
============================================
Files 600 602 +2
Lines 40241 40426 +185
Branches 2111 2113 +2
============================================
+ Hits 19753 19815 +62
- Misses 20450 20573 +123
Partials 38 38
|
lgtm, but I'm concerned that we have no way to verify this PR before devnet 5. Ideally we should have an e2e test to replace phase0 one to let it run until finalized |
I think we should make a devnet-5 branch and merge this PR into that instead. |
Motivation
Description
SingleAttestation
post-electra which can be gossiped as is, we might need it to emitsingle_attestation
event pre-electa as noted in comment)