-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ol-cesium chrome 76: too many errors #8105
Comments
Do you have a link to an example that reproduces this issue? Do the examples on Sandcastle load for you? https://cesiumjs.org/Cesium/Apps/Sandcastle/index.html This sounds like it could be this issue, which was a bug in Chrome #7798 (comment). Can you try running Chrome Canary 77 to see if the issue is fixed there? |
Thank you!
No, because it's too big and confidential.
Yes, it's work fine.
In Chrome 77 everything works fine. |
I've started seeing warnings about
Should I open a new issue? I get the warning when viewing the "Billboards" Sandcastle demo. |
Also, I started seeing "Error: WebGL warning: generateMipmap: Tex image TEXTURE_2D level 0 is incurring lazy initialization." I don't know if they're related. If I don't hear anything here soon I'll open a new issue for both warnings at once. |
@thw0rted there's some discussion here about that extension: #7798 (comment) My comment there links to where the extensions are requested in the source code. Kai's comment here #7798 (comment) mentions there was a spec change and that extension now needs to be requested explicitly. Can you see if adding it fixes the warning? And if so open a PR? And if the other warning is still there, I think that would be a separate issue if you can reproduce it in Sandcastle. |
Your link points to a set of lines in the master branch but it looks like the file has changed significantly since May. I set a breakpoint in my browser's devtools and called I can put together a PR but it seems like somebody with more knowledge of the internals than I have might want to look into the implications of failing to get the extension -- is there a fallback path in a renderer somewhere that should be activated when the extension is missing? Also, would there be further implications in Chrome, on mobile, etc? That thread you linked made it sound more complicated than just adding this one line. Also: I opened #8360 to track the other warning. |
After chrome update:
And no features on screen.
Before Chrome 76 everything works fine.
Cesium
1.60.0
Is it chrome, ol-cesium or cesium bug?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: