-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GroundPolylineGeometry missing/occluded segment #7855
Comments
Thanks for following up on this @wallw-bits. I'm surprised shifting the position ever so slightly fixes that gap. @likangning93 do you have any advice on where to look here? Lowering the granularity from the default |
@wallw-bits I might not have time to dig deeper into this for a few days, but if it helps, With
|
I looked into this a bit. I did not see any |
@likangning93 Further inspection shows that the normal computed at the inbetween point here and subsequently packed into Therefore I'm fairly sure that the issue lies in |
Thanks @wallw-bits! I think I have a hunch as to what's going on:
|
GroundPolylinePrimitive/Geometry with specific points produces a missing or occluded segment (with or without terrain; also with
GEODESIC
orRHUMB
arc types). In the following example, changing the second vertex latitude to48.499
fixes the issue.Sandcastle example: Sandcastle example
Browser: Chrome 74.0.3729.131 and Firefox 66.0.5
Operating System: OS X 10.14.4
Edit:
This is easily reproducible with lines which are already interpolated along geodesics, but not with the same granularity as Cesium. The items producing this issue in our application are geodesic lines between points with a granularity of 100km.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: