Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Model translucency issue in 1.7 #2572

Closed
pjcozzi opened this issue Mar 10, 2015 · 2 comments · Fixed by #2573
Closed

Model translucency issue in 1.7 #2572

pjcozzi opened this issue Mar 10, 2015 · 2 comments · Fixed by #2573

Comments

@pjcozzi
Copy link
Contributor

pjcozzi commented Mar 10, 2015

@bagnell I will send you the model. Can you look at this? Perhaps this is an OIT change? However, setting orderIndependentTranslucency to false did not help. I tried to briefly tweak the model alpha values, but it also did not help.

1.6:

image

1.7:

image

@bagnell
Copy link
Contributor

bagnell commented Mar 10, 2015

@pjcozzi Does the model create separate commands for back/front faces when blending is enabled? The commands being submitted were only those culling the back faces. If you turn OIT off, this model still doesn't look right.

@pjcozzi
Copy link
Contributor Author

pjcozzi commented Mar 11, 2015

Does the model create separate commands for back/front faces when blending is enabled?

No. We could do this, but I think I would want to do it server-side so that the Cesium client truly renders what the model describes, not what we think it should describe.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants