-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 948
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve Status Icon Descriptions #214
Comments
|
@He3556 My thought about the icons. The currently stated functions are described as:
should
|
@He3556, I fully agree with @E3V3A on this. The Status Icon should only change from green to yellow if something happened. If we start to use our Icons for different networks and such, users will just get even moire confused and developers likewise. We are just discussing the descriptions here, the whole usage thing should essentially stay the same. Thank you for understanding and reviewing this thing again. |
I agree with @E3V3A as well. Consistency is super important for average users like me. |
I'm considering also including BTS with easily broken encryption ( < A5/3 ) as Yellow insecure. |
But if you say "Yellow = Hostile Service Area: One or more FBTS are in operation in this vicinity." that sounds more like a red icon to me. @E3V3A yes, that's what i am talking about - in most 2G networks they still use <A5/3
|
It depend on your device, but relies on having one or more of QMI, AT, SIM, ServiceMode interfaces readily available, or possibly other baseband debug-log hack. @andr3jx ? We need to read-up on this, but is a different issue. |
Seems like we're stuck on the explanations of our Icons, @He3556? To answer your question where we can get the ciphering from: In the long term this should be done via the Android-CipheringIndicator-API. |
Yes @E3V3A and SecUpwN you are both right - We can't get this CI right now. So i would take the yellow icon if 2G - rather than waiting untill we might get CI under certain conditions on a certain phone. |
Feel invited to edit the Status Icons accordingly to reflect your wish, @He3556! |
@He3556 ...Deja Vu: I'm working on it... |
I've updated the Status Icons descriptions according to above discussions. @ Dev's: Please review! |
Review passed on my side. Polished some things, wondering about |
If a developer or project member wants to discuss it - i would like to meet you in one of our chat rooms. I don't want to mess up our issues with conversations, that makes it hard for people to get the important informations. And i am also missing some ToDo's on our internal list. We are working on a few things at the same time right now. That makes it hard to follow the development. I also try to keep the "Development Status" updated from the informations i get via e-mail from all the issues. With the ToDo Tool it would be much easier to keep the control
|
Thanks for chiming in, but no need to shout. To answer your questions here, @He3556:
Voting for
Done. Feel free to edit the codes according to our current agreements. Thank you.
Yes,
Right on spot again,
Either you're good in guessing or our Icons make sense. The current description is: |
@SecUpwN I'm on the scoring table, which will be an update and modification of the Gist one, but you have to give me a couple of days, because of the holidays, as I have a family obligations. Please stand by. |
@E3V3A, don't worry, I will. Just update the colors in the Detection List whenever you feel like it. UPDATE 29.12.2014: @He3556, I've re-read everything here, the Icon descriptions itself do make good sense, I'm just waiting for @E3V3A to add his scoring table to our Status Icons. Please allow some time. |
@E3V3A, where did you want to add the scoring table? Is it in fact the Detection List? Is this solved? |
I really haven't been able to respond properly to this one, due to work load. The status icons seem fine, but they're not used in the code as I haven't had time to finish the detection scoring table. But the table will appear in # 230 when done. BUT since the actual status icon descriptions are correct for now, I think we can close this, and I'll open a new issue for the implementation of these, once that score table has been clarified. |
Hi there, folks! This should be a relatively simple Issue regarding the descriptions of our Status Icons as suggested by @E3V3A in his #201 (comment). The
Short Explanations
andDetailed Explanations
should be updated to reflect the current usage of oure Icons and also indicate to users how to behave without thinking too much about it. Discussion is open, let us review the current wording. Thank you!The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: