You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The latest xrelease shows 548,202 names with the issue "Sync Outside Target" , however many of them don't have that problem. For example:
The Genus Arthrolobium Rchb. was merged under Fabaceae, as it is in it's original source Brazilian Flora 2020 project
This wrong results are hiding the true errors like: Abathescalpellum fissum (Hoek, 1907) is merged under the family Scalpellidae, while in the original source this genus is under the subfamily Meroscalpellinae.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The latest xrelease shows 548,202 names with the issue "Sync Outside Target" , however many of them don't have that problem. For example:
The Genus Arthrolobium Rchb. was merged under Fabaceae, as it is in it's original source Brazilian Flora 2020 project
This wrong results are hiding the true errors like:
Abathescalpellum fissum (Hoek, 1907) is merged under the family Scalpellidae, while in the original source this genus is under the subfamily Meroscalpellinae.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: