-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Continuation hole #6
Conversation
…t must be changed in proofs.
0bf4ff3
to
c0fb19f
Compare
@denismerigoux you wanted to review the changes. I want to merge so i can make other PR on top of this one with the others solutions we discussed together. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @adelaett ! I left several markers where I think you can clean up old commented code. Remember that in the end, the repo will have to be clean since we will submit it as an artifact to the future paper :)
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ Inductive term := | |||
| Match_ (u t1: term) (t2: {bind term}) | |||
| ENone | |||
| ESome (t: term) | |||
(* | Fold (f: {bind 2 term}) (ts: list term) (t: term) *) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess this you will add later in your work :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes indeed!
Using continuation holes and the new typing invariant.
Must repair the proofs.