You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While the shaded blue polygon approach works okay for project geometries at smaller scale, that is not the case when it comes to global/regional/larger project areas......as seen in the screen grab below. Placing markers at the centroid for all projects on the dashboard map view, while keeping the shaded (or other drawing like a bounding box) area for the map view of projects may be an improvement.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think we should look at a couple different display options before making a change. I think for example of the bounding box wasn't shaded it wouldn't be an issue. @clash99 what do you think?
@wonderchook - I agree. I think if we could visually remove the bounding box it would be a huge improvement - if we could make the shading and border transparent that would work.
This brings up a good question though about how to handle global projects where the map interactions doesn't make sense. The search box task can address some of this (#339).
I think we can remove this for now, with global projects already implemented and the new approach for project extent with the project designer this is now a lower priority. Please reopen if needed.
While the shaded blue polygon approach works okay for project geometries at smaller scale, that is not the case when it comes to global/regional/larger project areas......as seen in the screen grab below. Placing markers at the centroid for all projects on the dashboard map view, while keeping the shaded (or other drawing like a bounding box) area for the map view of projects may be an improvement.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: