docs: Address the Differences Between Boot Loaders and Boot Manager #53
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are two parts to this PR. The first part is renaming all instances of boot loaders to boot managers. The second is adding a preambule to the boot manager installation page to differentiate between the two terms.
When talking about UEFI systems, the correct term to refer to systemd-boot, rEFInd and even GRUB
is boot manager. A boot manager is not the same as a boot loader.
The motivation of this PR is the big interest I gained after reading through some of Rod Smith's web pages regarding EFI boot loaders, found here.
Some can argue that this can be considered nitpicking. While I do agree partially, I am also stand by the fact that using the correct terms must be necessary as to not cause misinformation and even confusion.