Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add support for coupled-reaction bounds #22

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jun 9, 2024
Merged

add support for coupled-reaction bounds #22

merged 10 commits into from
Jun 9, 2024

Conversation

exaexa
Copy link
Member

@exaexa exaexa commented Jun 8, 2024

Closes #20

Completely prospectively (and accordingly to the ConstraintTree practice and FAIR model assembly), I also added the possibility to actually identify and name the couplings.

@exaexa exaexa requested a review from stelmo June 8, 2024 14:45
@exaexa exaexa self-assigned this Jun 8, 2024
@exaexa exaexa added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 8, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (1e3147b) to head (ae19bb9).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master       #22   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            6         6           
  Lines          220       277   +57     
=========================================
+ Hits           220       277   +57     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@exaexa exaexa merged commit 857c3bb into master Jun 9, 2024
3 checks passed
@exaexa exaexa deleted the mk-coupling branch June 9, 2024 10:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

support additional constraints
3 participants