Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issues with the 3D EPI option #318

Open
torbenelund opened this issue Mar 14, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Issues with the 3D EPI option #318

torbenelund opened this issue Mar 14, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@torbenelund
Copy link

Dear multiband developers

Thanks for providing the excellent multi band EPI sequence. It is so fantastic to have a super flexible EPI sequence which can do most of the things I desire.

Yesterday I tried the 3D option in the multi band sequence and managed to set it up with 3 slabs of 14 slices acquired with an enplane acceleration of 3 and a Accel. factor 3D also of 3.

The SNR in the images look decent, but I have to issues.

  1. If I try to save Magn./Phase I get a reconstruction error (see attached screen shot
  2. There seems to be some "leakage" between slabs when 3D acceleration is used. Decreasing the slice overlap factor to -50% removes the problem, but introduces significant signal loss in the slices at the boarder of the slab. Increasing the slice oversampling up to 100 % does not help.3.

Do you have any tips I can try out, to solve these two issues?

Best regards
Torben

ReconError2
ReconError1
slab_leakage

@eauerbach eauerbach self-assigned this Mar 27, 2023
@eauerbach
Copy link
Member

I will look into the magn/phas issue, the reconstruction should not fail. As for the artifacts, I don't know that anything is "wrong", it may just be that the protocol you are attempting is not feasible at 3T with that coil.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants