Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Broken .toml file #302

Closed
mcepl opened this issue Jan 3, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Broken .toml file #302

mcepl opened this issue Jan 3, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@mcepl
Copy link
Contributor

mcepl commented Jan 3, 2017

matej@xerus:~/Build/ripgrep$ cargo build --release
failed to parse manifest at `/home/matej/Build/ripgrep/Cargo.toml`

Caused by:
  could not parse input as TOML
Cargo.toml:42:9 expected a key but found an empty string
Cargo.toml:42:9-42:10 expected `.`, but found `'`

matej@xerus:~/Build/ripgrep$ 
@BurntSushi
Copy link
Owner

BurntSushi commented Jan 3, 2017 via email

@mcepl
Copy link
Contributor Author

mcepl commented Jan 3, 2017

What's in Ubuntu 16.04, rustc 1.7.0 and cargo 0.8.0.

@mcepl
Copy link
Contributor Author

mcepl commented Jan 3, 2017

OK, so rust is still too unstable for normal use. I'll get the staticly build file.

@mcepl mcepl closed this as completed Jan 3, 2017
@BurntSushi
Copy link
Owner

That's wrong. Rust is quite stable. ripgrep simply requires a newer version of Rust than what you have installed.

@mcepl
Copy link
Contributor Author

mcepl commented Jan 3, 2017

Sorry, I didn't mean to be rude. However, then probably it would be good to reconsider the required compatibility. I am not personally invested in Ubuntu (being the Red Hat employee, I use Fedora/RHEL for all my needs, and we have the latest rust even for RHEL-7/EPEL), but 16.04 is LTS, so I guess it could be wise to have it supported.

@mcepl mcepl reopened this Jan 3, 2017
@BurntSushi
Copy link
Owner

No, it's not happening, sorry. I can't afford to do that kind of maintenance. We need to move forward.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants