FAQ page or pages, maybe in-browser

[grahamperrin]

Meta, tracking: #582

Frequently asked questions might include:

• …
• …
• …

(I have a handful in mind, but I'd like someone else to make the first suggestion.)

In addition, we have at least one frequently offered answer to questions (in a broad range of troubleshooting situations) that have very diverse wording. Finding a 'standard' form or of wording for a question like that can't be done correctly on first publication, it'll probably take a handful of changes over a period of months to get it right with enough plain English etc..

[WagnerGMD]

Allons-y (like would say Ten in Doctor Who) !
Then let's try (or start) by 2 examples about the privacy :

• How to handle the "Exceptions Cookies"
• The geolocation isn't available (remove from the browser)
• Another trouble Mozilla Memory Leak ?
• Load any videos faster and entirely (or handle the buffering specially on youtube)
• etc

[grahamperrin]

Thanks.

One of those two is also in my personal record (just begun), Waterfox variations from Mozilla Firefox norms

I imagine that for brevity, an FAQ page can include two bullet points leading to separate pages:

• one page listing things that are disabled
• one page listing things that were removed (can not be enabled, even through use of about:config).

[WagnerGMD]

You're welcome @grahamperrin and as you can see, I have add 2 anothers examples.

To begun, I believe it could be one good idea to follow (for these pages).
Otherwise for a little page, we can put an anchor HTML .

[grahamperrin]

We need to explain about multi-process Waterfox, enabled by default (risky) after installing any extension that is reportedly (or truly) incompatible with multi-process. #397 (comment) there's a shortlist of some of the troubles.

Also make users aware that the workaround to trouble – disabling multi-process – will be lost if Waterfox is refreshed.

[grahamperrin]

Related (to multiple issues), in Reddit:

• e10s: availability of multi-process with older versions of operating systems : waterfox

– an authoritative answer there should allow us to draft something for an FAQ.

[MrAlex94]

Could you add this info to the meta issue? Too many bugs are clogging up my email :-(

[WagnerGMD]

I'm wonder did you create another topic about : "How to improve Waterfox ?"
Because otherwise I believe we might need to build a list on this matter. Unless it's already done somewhere ?

[grahamperrin]

… did you create another topic about : "How to improve Waterfox ?" …

Me? No.

General discussion: https://www.reddit.com/r/waterfox/ – that'll be the best place for generally how to improve things.

---

Selected issues (meta): #538

Waterfox web site issues (meta): #582

Open bugs: https://github.com/MrAlex94/Waterfox/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc+label%3Abug

Open enhancements: https://github.com/MrAlex94/Waterfox/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc+label%3Aenhancement

All open issues: https://github.com/MrAlex94/Waterfox/issues/

[WagnerGMD]

Now I can take a look (or find) easily the topic about the enhancements.

So thank you @grahamperrin but for now I will avoid reddit (in the futur ? Perhaps)... Let's say I don't like it because it will require a lot of improvements (specially the toolbar and even the MarkDown etc).
No as today it's remain bad....despite I had notice a fews improvements recently (these last months).

[grahamperrin]

https://www.reddit.com/r/redesign/ – much ongoing, so I posted a few highlights and lowlights to https://redd.it/8j5dow