Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

suscli with AppImage #259

Open
paccerdk opened this issue Oct 4, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

suscli with AppImage #259

paccerdk opened this issue Oct 4, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@paccerdk
Copy link

paccerdk commented Oct 4, 2024

I'm trying to get remote connections working, using the AppImage,

I was browsing the source code, and #154 seems to hint, that running "./SigDigger-0.3.0-x86_64-full.AppImage -t suscli" might be a way of calling suscli when using the AppImage?
However, i just get "unknown tool 'suscli'"

calling with "-t RMSViewer" works fine

The fact that SUSCLI_ARGS is empty makes me think that i might be wrong about my conclusion, but i'm not sure

Is it currently not possible to use suscli and/or run a remote server with the current AppImage?
If not, maybe it might be worth considering

Additionally, a --server parameter could possibly also be a neat shortcut to have

@BatchDrake
Copy link
Owner

Rename the AppImage file to just suscli. Or even better, create a soft link to it named suscli, like:

% ln -s /SigDigger-0.3.0-x86_64-full.AppImage suscli
% ./suscli

The -t option is only for the SigDigger executable, to choose which graphical tool to run. If you rename the AppImage, it will look for the appropriate executable inside the bundle.

@paccerdk
Copy link
Author

paccerdk commented Oct 5, 2024

Oh, I see. The symbolic link approach is pretty neat, thanks!
Should i keep this ticket open for the suscli with -t option / adding the --server suggestions?

Its mostly unimportant QoL, feel free to close the ticket
Thanks again!

@BatchDrake
Copy link
Owner

Nah, it's a good a idea to have a GUI to quickly start up a server (that's how it would fit under the -t option). I am going to keep this open as a feature request. Thanks!

@BatchDrake BatchDrake self-assigned this Oct 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants