We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The default value for this according to the aks docs is "172.17.0.1/16", https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/aks/configure-azure-cni
Can I presume the benefit is to allow for "172.17.0.1/16" to be usable in the network?
Are there downsides to not using an RFC 1918 address here?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Since 2020 the default runtime is containerd and not Docker https://github.com/Azure/AKS/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#release-2020-06-29
The setting docker_bridge_cidr is doing nothing. If you check the interfaces on the AKS nodes they dont have any Docker bridge configured.
The setting should be dropped from the example to avoid confusion
Sorry, something went wrong.
azurerm_kubernetes_cluster
network_profile.docker_bridge_cidr
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
The default value for this according to the aks docs is "172.17.0.1/16", https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/aks/configure-azure-cni
Can I presume the benefit is to allow for "172.17.0.1/16" to be usable in the network?
Are there downsides to not using an RFC 1918 address here?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: