[QUERY] Does iterableByPage enable for all resource provider?

[chuckz1321]

Query/Question
A clear and concise ask/query.
Does iterableByPage support AzureResourceManager.virtualMachineImages().listByRegion() ?

Why is this not a Bug or a feature Request?
A clear explanation of why is this not a bug or a feature request?
iterableByPage() returns all entities...

Setup (please complete the following information if applicable):

• OS: [e.g. iOS] Windows
• IDE: [e.g. IntelliJ] InterlliJ
• Library/Libraries: [e.g. com.azure:azure-core:1.16.0 (groupId:artifactId:version)] azure-resourcemanager 2.10.0

Information Checklist
Kindly make sure that you have added all the following information above and checkoff the required fields otherwise we will treat the issuer as an incomplete report

• Query Added
• Setup information Added use this SDK in Mooncake

[joshfree]

Hi @chuckz1321 thanks for reaching out to us via this GitHub issue. @weidongxu-microsoft could you please follow up with @chuckz1321?

[weidongxu-microsoft]

@chuckz1321

This API is an exception. There is no REST API to list images by region. It had to be done cascaded, list by offer, list by sku on offer, list by image on sku.
https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-java/blob/main/sdk/resourcemanager/azure-resourcemanager-compute/src/main/java/com/azure/resourcemanager/compute/implementation/VirtualMachineImagesImpl.java#L85-L98

We currently have no good solution to make this nested API call truly pageable.
You may call following API (but then need to iterate again on different sku and offer)

        azure
            .virtualMachines()
            .manager()
            .serviceClient()
            .getVirtualMachineImages()
            .listWithResponse(...);

link #19494

[chuckz1321]

@weidongxu-microsoft Thanks for you help! Actually we were facing the issue that the query may take longer time and each images will interactive with management endpoint, so that the netty thread will block and finally throw an exception saying the queue is not enough to hold more requests. I configured the netty connection provider and mitigted this issue. (Simply enlarge the timeout parameter...)

[ghost]

Hi @chuckz1321. Thank you for opening this issue and giving us the opportunity to assist. We believe that this has been addressed. If you feel that further discussion is needed, please add a comment with the text “/unresolve” to remove the “issue-addressed” label and continue the conversation.

[github-actions]

Hi @chuckz1321, since you haven’t asked that we /unresolve the issue, we’ll close this out. If you believe further discussion is needed, please add a comment /unresolve to reopen the issue.