-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RosettaNet Process configuration apis #6702
Conversation
Integration account - RosettaNet CRUD APIs Integration account- agreement changes for RosettaNet agreement type.
SDK Automation [Logs] (Generated from 2838c11, Iteration 24)Python: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-python [Logs] [Diff]Java: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-java [Logs] [Diff]Go: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-go [Logs] [Diff]
JavaScript: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-js [Logs] [Diff]
Ruby: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-ruby [Logs] [Diff]
|
Automation for azure-sdk-for-pythonA PR has been created for you: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-goA PR has been created for you: |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
@praveensri Add ARM Review. Meanwhile, please solve the CI errors. |
Fixed casing as required by CI
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed the casing
Hi, public.rest-api-specs Failing after 1m — Build #Azure OpenAPI failed e.g 👍
Thanks, |
Please review |
@raych1 I checked the error messages. They are exited errors. Based on my understanding, the error messages should be suppressed. |
@praveensri Hello. I talked with @raych1 offline. Recently, several new checks are enabled in ModelValidation. So you and your team need to fix these errors. |
…into AzureLogic-rosettanet-apis
…into AzureLogic-rosettanet-apis
…into AzureLogic-rosettanet-apis
@@ -4921,6 +4921,232 @@ | |||
"x-ms-odata": "#/definitions/IntegrationAccountSessionFilter" | |||
} | |||
}, | |||
"/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Logic/integrationAccounts/{integrationAccountName}/rosettanetprocessconfigurations": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
rosettanetprocessconfigurations [](start = 143, length = 31)
nit - The resource type should be camelCased for readability and to match existing convention.
specification/logic/resource-manager/Microsoft.Logic/stable/2016-06-01/logic.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
specification/logic/resource-manager/Microsoft.Logic/stable/2016-06-01/logic.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're adding an enum value to an enum that is not modeled as string in a stable API version. This is considered a breaking change because an existing client will not be able to deserialize a GET response. You need to introduce a new API version for this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
The spellcheck with pass if the words are camelCased, or if you add them to https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/master/custom-words.txt if they can't be |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The spellcheck with pass if the words are camelCased, or if you add them to https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/master/custom-words.txt if they can't be
Created PR #6815 to update the words under https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/master/custom-words.txt
specification/logic/resource-manager/Microsoft.Logic/stable/2016-06-01/logic.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
OK, might be better to just include that in this PR |
Yep, added in this PR |
by mistake I clicked re-review icon for @majastrz, Please ignore |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Resigned off :)
Thanks majastrz, Any updates on merging? |
@OpenAPIBot sdkautomation rebuild |
@NullMDR Could you please check the SDK Automation process? |
@yaohaizh @michaeljqzq Hello. Please check this PR to make sure it will not influence the SDK. |
Wait for @NullMDR for the issue fix |
@myronfanqiu LGTM for js sdk part |
Integration account - RosettaNet CRUD APIs
Integration account- agreement changes for RosettaNet agreement type.
Latest improvements:
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Contribution checklist:
ARM API Review Checklist
Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.
Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.