Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RosettaNet Process configuration apis #6702

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Aug 2, 2019
Merged

Conversation

praveensri
Copy link
Contributor

@praveensri praveensri commented Jul 23, 2019

Integration account - RosettaNet CRUD APIs
Integration account- agreement changes for RosettaNet agreement type.

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

Integration account - RosettaNet CRUD APIs
Integration account- agreement changes for RosettaNet agreement type.
@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jul 23, 2019

SDK Automation [Logs] (Generated from 2838c11, Iteration 24)

Succeeded Python: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-python [Logs] [Diff]
Warning Java: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-java [Logs] [Diff]
  • Warning logic/resource-manager/v2016_06_01 [Logs]
  • Warning logic/resource-manager/v2018_07_01_preview [Logs]
Warning Go: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-go [Logs] [Diff]
Warning JavaScript: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-js [Logs] [Diff]
  • Warning @azure/arm-logic [Logs]
Warning Ruby: test-repo-billy/azure-sdk-for-ruby [Logs] [Diff]
  • No packages generated.

@msftclas
Copy link

msftclas commented Jul 23, 2019

CLA assistant check
All CLA requirements met.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 23, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

A PR has been created for you:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#6627

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jul 23, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

A PR has been created for you:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#5416

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@mmyyrroonn mmyyrroonn added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Jul 23, 2019
@mmyyrroonn
Copy link
Contributor

@praveensri Add ARM Review. Meanwhile, please solve the CI errors.

Fixed casing as required by CI
Copy link
Contributor Author

@praveensri praveensri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed the casing

@praveensri
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi,
Some of the failures under following CI run are not related with my changes.

public.rest-api-specs Failing after 1m — Build #Azure OpenAPI failed

e.g 👍

error :  
  operationId: ListOperations
  scenario: List Microsoft.Logic operations
  source: response
  responseCode: '200'
  severity: 0
  code: RESPONSE_BODY_NOT_IN_EXAMPLE
  details:
  code: RESPONSE_BODY_NOT_IN_EXAMPLE
  id: OAV130
  message: >-
  Response statusCode "200" for operation "ListOperations" has no response
  body provided in the example, however the response does have a "schema"
  defined in the swagger spec.
  position:
  line: 5333
  column: 14
  url: >-
  specification/logic/resource-manager/Microsoft.Logic/stable/2016-06-01/logic.json
  title: '#/paths/1providers1Microsoft.Logic~1operations/get'
  directives:
  R3016: .*
  level: error

Thanks,
Praveen

@praveensri
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please review

@mmyyrroonn
Copy link
Contributor

@raych1 I checked the error messages. They are exited errors. Based on my understanding, the error messages should be suppressed.

@mmyyrroonn
Copy link
Contributor

@praveensri Hello. I talked with @raych1 offline. Recently, several new checks are enabled in ModelValidation. So you and your team need to fix these errors.

@@ -4921,6 +4921,232 @@
"x-ms-odata": "#/definitions/IntegrationAccountSessionFilter"
}
},
"/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Logic/integrationAccounts/{integrationAccountName}/rosettanetprocessconfigurations": {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rosettanetprocessconfigurations [](start = 143, length = 31)

nit - The resource type should be camelCased for readability and to match existing convention.

@majastrz majastrz added the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label Jul 31, 2019
Copy link
Member

@majastrz majastrz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're adding an enum value to an enum that is not modeled as string in a stable API version. This is considered a breaking change because an existing client will not be able to deserialize a GET response. You need to introduce a new API version for this.

@majastrz majastrz added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Jul 31, 2019
Copy link
Member

@majastrz majastrz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@nschonni
Copy link
Contributor

nschonni commented Jul 31, 2019

The spellcheck with pass if the words are camelCased, or if you add them to https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/master/custom-words.txt if they can't be

Copy link
Contributor Author

@praveensri praveensri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The spellcheck with pass if the words are camelCased, or if you add them to https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/master/custom-words.txt if they can't be

Created PR #6815 to update the words under https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/master/custom-words.txt

@nschonni
Copy link
Contributor

OK, might be better to just include that in this PR

@praveensri
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, might be better to just include that in this PR

Yep, added in this PR

@praveensri praveensri requested a review from majastrz July 31, 2019 16:56
@praveensri
Copy link
Contributor Author

by mistake I clicked re-review icon for @majastrz, Please ignore

Copy link
Member

@majastrz majastrz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resigned off :)

@praveensri
Copy link
Contributor Author

Resigned off :)

Thanks majastrz, Any updates on merging?

@mmyyrroonn
Copy link
Contributor

@OpenAPIBot sdkautomation rebuild

@mmyyrroonn
Copy link
Contributor

@NullMDR Could you please check the SDK Automation process?

@mmyyrroonn
Copy link
Contributor

@yaohaizh @michaeljqzq Hello. Please check this PR to make sure it will not influence the SDK.

@michaeljqzq
Copy link
Contributor

Wait for @NullMDR for the issue fix

@michaeljqzq
Copy link
Contributor

@myronfanqiu LGTM for js sdk part

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants