Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: jsonfmt workloadmonitor #6274

Merged

Conversation

nschonni
Copy link
Contributor

@nschonni nschonni commented Jun 7, 2019

Ran jsonfmt -w "specification/workloadmonitor/**/*.json"

Ran `jsonfmt -w "specification/workloadmonitor/**/*.json"`
@openapi-sdkautomation
Copy link

openapi-sdkautomation bot commented Jun 7, 2019

SDK Automation [Logs] (Generated from 2ecf160)

Pending Python: Azure/azure-sdk-for-python
  • Package generation pending.
Pending Java: Azure/azure-sdk-for-java
  • Package generation pending.
Pending Go: Azure/azure-sdk-for-go
  • Package generation pending.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 7, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-js

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-js

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 7, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 7, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#5830

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 7, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

Encountered a Subprocess error: (azure-sdk-for-java)

Command: ['/usr/local/bin/autorest', '/tmp/tmp56tbt0pz/rest/specification/workloadmonitor/resource-manager/readme.md', '--perform-load=false', '--swagger-to-sdk', '--output-artifact=configuration.json', '--input-file=foo', '--output-folder=/tmp/tmpruwpfj9r']
Finished with return code 7
and output:

AutoRest code generation utility [version: 2.0.4283; node: v8.12.0]
(C) 2018 Microsoft Corporation.
https://aka.ms/autorest
Failure:
Error: Unable to start AutoRest Core from /root/.autorest/@[email protected]/node_modules/@microsoft.azure/autorest-core
Error: Unable to start AutoRest Core from /root/.autorest/@[email protected]/node_modules/@microsoft.azure/autorest-core
    at main (/opt/node_modules/autorest/dist/app.js:232:19)
    at <anonymous>

/root/.autorest/@[email protected]/node_modules/@microsoft.azure/autorest-core/dist/app.js:33
    autorest_core_1.Shutdown();
    ^
ReferenceError: autorest_core_1 is not defined
    at process.on (/root/.autorest/@[email protected]/node_modules/@microsoft.azure/autorest-core/dist/app.js:33:5)
    at emitOne (events.js:121:20)
    at process.emit (events.js:211:7)
    at process.emit (/node_modules/source-map-support/source-map-support.js:439:21)
fs.js:612
  return binding.close(fd);
                 ^

Error: EBADF: bad file descriptor, close
    at Object.fs.closeSync (fs.js:612:18)
    at StaticVolumeFile.shutdown (/opt/node_modules/autorest/dist/static-loader.js:352:10)
    at StaticFilesystem.shutdown (/opt/node_modules/autorest/dist/static-loader.js:406:17)
    at process.exit.n [as exit] (/opt/node_modules/autorest/dist/static-loader.js:169:11)
    at printErrorAndExit (/node_modules/source-map-support/source-map-support.js:423:11)
    at process.emit (/node_modules/source-map-support/source-map-support.js:435:16)
    at process._fatalException (bootstrap_node.js:391:26)

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jun 7, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-go

@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@praries880
Copy link

@sergey-shandar Can you kindly merge this PR?

@praries880
Copy link

@sergey-shandar can you kindly merge this PR as the model validation errors are not related to changes in here.

@sergey-shandar sergey-shandar merged commit fc526bb into Azure:master Jun 12, 2019
@nschonni nschonni deleted the chore--jsonfmt-workloadmonitor branch June 12, 2019 23:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants