-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add message of the day for Linux nodes #16942
add message of the day for Linux nodes #16942
Conversation
Hi, @alexeldeib Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected] |
[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks. |
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
Hi @alexeldeib, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of
|
"messageOfTheDay": { | ||
"type": "string", | ||
"title": "Message of the day for Linux nodes, base64-encoded.", | ||
"description": "A base64-encoded string which will be written to /etc/motd after decoding. This allows customization of the message of the day for linux nodes. It must be a static string (i.e., will be printed raw and not be executed as a script)." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Assume this is just ignored for Windows node pools? Or is specifying it on a Windows node pool an error?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I initially ignored it, but that felt a bit misleading, so I ended up adding a validation error. welcome a review on the RP side ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 to erroring - silently ignoring fields is a smell IMO.
Might be worth tacking "This field cannot be set on Windows node pools" or something onto the end of the description, although that is kindof implied based on the "Message for Linux nodes" so feel free to ignore this if you dont feel its worth the extra text
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added a clarifying comment
38b1448
into
Azure:dev-containerservice-Microsoft.ContainerService-2021-11-01-preview
…2021-11-01-preview (#17104) * Adds base for updating Microsoft.ContainerService from version stable/2021-10-01 to version 2021-11-01-preview * Updates readme * Updates API version in new specs and examples * feat: define OIDC issuer profile (#16834) * feat: define OIDC issuer profile * fix: add `OIDC` to custom-wrods.txt * doc: update description * style: fix style check * fix: add type * add enableNamespaceResources in Managed Cluster (#16835) * add enableNamespaceResources in Managed Cluster * update example for enableNamespaceResources * changed description of enableNamespaceresources * change description for enableNamespaceResources * feat: define currentKubernetesVersion (#16878) Add property currentKubernetesVersion for feature AliasMinorVersion * add message of the day for Linux nodes (#16942) * [AKS] feat: add python SDK generation for 1001/1101-preview api (#16895) * feat: add python SDK generation for 1001/1101-preview api * fix: missing tag * fix: update path * fix: update path * fix: typo * feat: update readme.python.md * Rebased from main to dev branch (#17081) Co-authored-by: Anumita Shenoy <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jianping Zeng <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ace Eldeib <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tong Chen <[email protected]>
…2021-11-01-preview (Azure#17104) * Adds base for updating Microsoft.ContainerService from version stable/2021-10-01 to version 2021-11-01-preview * Updates readme * Updates API version in new specs and examples * feat: define OIDC issuer profile (Azure#16834) * feat: define OIDC issuer profile * fix: add `OIDC` to custom-wrods.txt * doc: update description * style: fix style check * fix: add type * add enableNamespaceResources in Managed Cluster (Azure#16835) * add enableNamespaceResources in Managed Cluster * update example for enableNamespaceResources * changed description of enableNamespaceresources * change description for enableNamespaceResources * feat: define currentKubernetesVersion (Azure#16878) Add property currentKubernetesVersion for feature AliasMinorVersion * add message of the day for Linux nodes (Azure#16942) * [AKS] feat: add python SDK generation for 1001/1101-preview api (Azure#16895) * feat: add python SDK generation for 1001/1101-preview api * fix: missing tag * fix: update path * fix: update path * fix: typo * feat: update readme.python.md * Rebased from main to dev branch (Azure#17081) Co-authored-by: Anumita Shenoy <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jianping Zeng <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ace Eldeib <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tong Chen <[email protected]>
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:
Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.
-[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits.
Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.