Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add property enableNodePublicIp #15871

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2021
Merged

Add property enableNodePublicIp #15871

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2021

Conversation

chrjia
Copy link
Contributor

@chrjia chrjia commented Aug 31, 2021 •
edited
Loading

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • [ x ] update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
    It's already deployed to public regions.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
    September
  4. If updating an existing version, please select the specific langauge SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • [ x ] No refresh required for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits.

  • [ x ] Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in a stable version
  • Removing properties in a stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in a stable version
  • Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @chrjia Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

    • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    [Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks.

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 31, 2021 •
    edited
    Loading

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    There are no breaking changes.

    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    ❌ R2008 - MutabilityWithReadOnly When property is modeled as 'readOnly': true then x-ms-mutability extension can only have 'read' value. When property is modeled as 'readOnly': false then applying x-ms-mutability extension with only 'read' value is not allowed. Extension contains invalid values: 'read'.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/mfe.json#L5989
    ❌ R2008 - MutabilityWithReadOnly When property is modeled as 'readOnly': true then x-ms-mutability extension can only have 'read' value. When property is modeled as 'readOnly': false then applying x-ms-mutability extension with only 'read' value is not allowed. Extension contains invalid values: 'read'.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/mfe.json#L6026
    ❌ R2008 - MutabilityWithReadOnly When property is modeled as 'readOnly': true then x-ms-mutability extension can only have 'read' value. When property is modeled as 'readOnly': false then applying x-ms-mutability extension with only 'read' value is not allowed. Extension contains invalid values: 'read'.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/mfe.json#L6950
    ❌ R2008 - MutabilityWithReadOnly When property is modeled as 'readOnly': true then x-ms-mutability extension can only have 'read' value. When property is modeled as 'readOnly': false then applying x-ms-mutability extension with only 'read' value is not allowed. Extension contains invalid values: 'read'.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/mfe.json#L7310
    ❌ R2008 - MutabilityWithReadOnly When property is modeled as 'readOnly': true then x-ms-mutability extension can only have 'read' value. When property is modeled as 'readOnly': false then applying x-ms-mutability extension with only 'read' value is not allowed. Extension contains invalid values: 'read'.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/mfe.json#L7691
    ❌ R2008 - MutabilityWithReadOnly When property is modeled as 'readOnly': true then x-ms-mutability extension can only have 'read' value. When property is modeled as 'readOnly': false then applying x-ms-mutability extension with only 'read' value is not allowed. Extension contains invalid values: 'read'.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/mfe.json#L7715
    ❌ R2008 - MutabilityWithReadOnly When property is modeled as 'readOnly': true then x-ms-mutability extension can only have 'read' value. When property is modeled as 'readOnly': false then applying x-ms-mutability extension with only 'read' value is not allowed. Extension contains invalid values: 'read'.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/mfe.json#L7723
    ❌ R2008 - MutabilityWithReadOnly When property is modeled as 'readOnly': true then x-ms-mutability extension can only have 'read' value. When property is modeled as 'readOnly': false then applying x-ms-mutability extension with only 'read' value is not allowed. Extension contains invalid values: 'read'.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/mfe.json#L8314
    ❌ R2008 - MutabilityWithReadOnly When property is modeled as 'readOnly': true then x-ms-mutability extension can only have 'read' value. When property is modeled as 'readOnly': false then applying x-ms-mutability extension with only 'read' value is not allowed. Extension contains invalid values: 'read'.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/mfe.json#L8416
    ❌ R2008 - MutabilityWithReadOnly When property is modeled as 'readOnly': true then x-ms-mutability extension can only have 'read' value. When property is modeled as 'readOnly': false then applying x-ms-mutability extension with only 'read' value is not allowed. Extension contains invalid values: 'read'.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/mfe.json#L9280
    ❌ R2008 - MutabilityWithReadOnly When property is modeled as 'readOnly': true then x-ms-mutability extension can only have 'read' value. When property is modeled as 'readOnly': false then applying x-ms-mutability extension with only 'read' value is not allowed. Extension contains invalid values: 'read'.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/mfe.json#L9373
    ❌ R2008 - MutabilityWithReadOnly When property is modeled as 'readOnly': true then x-ms-mutability extension can only have 'read' value. When property is modeled as 'readOnly': false then applying x-ms-mutability extension with only 'read' value is not allowed. Extension contains invalid values: 'read'.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/mfe.json#L9397
    ❌ R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L2783
    ❌ R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L2897
    ❌ R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L2978
    ❌ R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L3120
    ❌ R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L3236
    ❌ R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L3276
    ❌ R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L3317
    ❌ R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L3344
    ❌ R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L3742
    ❌ R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L3768
    ❌ R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L3786
    ❌ R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData The response of operation:'WorkspaceConnections_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L1680
    ❌ R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData The response of operation:'WorkspaceConnections_Create' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L1628
    ❌ R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.'
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L415
    ❌ R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.'
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L456
    ❌ R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.'
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L1436
    ❌ R4011 - DeleteOperationResponses The delete operation is defined without a 200 or 204 error response implementation,please add it.'
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L881
    ❌ R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema.
    Location: Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/machineLearningServices.json#L37
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
    The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:
    Rule Message
    ⚠️ Modeler/MissingType "readme":"machinelearningservices/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-03-01-preview",
    "details":"The schema 'components·1dsxf3l·schemas·commandjob·properties·parameters·additionalproperties' has no type or format information whatsoever. Location:\n file:///home/vsts/work/1/azure-rest-api-specs/specification/machinelearningservices/resource-manager/Microsoft.MachineLearningServices/preview/2021-03-01-preview/mfe.json#/components/schemas/components·1dsxf3l·schemas·commandjob·properties·parameters·additionalproperties"
    💬 AutorestCore/Exception "readme":"machinelearningservices/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-03-01-preview",
    "details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0)"
    💬 AutorestCore/Exception "readme":"machinelearningservices/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-03-01-preview",
    "details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"


    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ PreCheck/PropertyRedeclarationWarning "readme":"machinelearningservices/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-03-01-preview",
    "details":"Schema 'AmlComputeNodesInformation' has a property 'nextLink' that is already declared the parent schema 'ComputeNodesInformation' but isn't significantly different. The property has been removed from AmlComputeNodesInformation"
    💬 AutorestCore/Exception "readme":"machinelearningservices/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-03-01-preview",
    "details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.15.456->4.15.456)"
    ️️✔️[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 31, 2021 •
    edited
    Loading

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️[Staging] ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️️✔️[Staging] SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python warning [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️❌ azure-cli-extensions failed [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    This was referenced Aug 31, 2021
    Closed
    Closed
    This was referenced Aug 31, 2021
    Closed
    Closed
    Closed
    Closed
    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Supported commands
    • help:
      • Get descriptions, examples and documentation about supported commands
      • Example: help "command_name"
    • list:
      • List all pipelines for this repository using a comment.
      • Example: "list"
    • run:
      • Run all pipelines or specific pipelines for this repository using a comment. Use this command by itself to trigger all related pipelines, or specify specific pipelines to run.
      • Example: "run" or "run pipeline_name, pipeline_name, pipeline_name"
    • where:
      • Report back the Azure DevOps orgs that are related to this repository and org
      • Example: "where"

    See additional documentation.

    @chrjia
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    chrjia commented Sep 1, 2021

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 15871 in repo Azure/azure-rest-api-specs

    @ArcturusZhang ArcturusZhang merged commit ef04da1 into Azure:main Sep 1, 2021
    This was referenced Sep 1, 2021
    Closed
    Closed
    Merged
    Closed
    Closed
    Closed
    Closed
    Closed
    ghost pushed a commit to Azure/azure-resource-manager-schemas that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2021
    [ReleasePR machinelearningservices] Add property enableNodePublicIp (#…
    0ba32d8 
    …1875)

Create to sync Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#15871
[ReCreate this PR](https://github.com/azure-resource-manager-schemas/compare/main...AzureSDKAutomation:sdkAuto/machinelearningservices?expand=1)
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Reviewers

    @ArcturusZhang ArcturusZhang ArcturusZhang approved these changes

    Assignees

    @ArcturusZhang ArcturusZhang

    Labels
    CI-BreakingChange-Python FixS360
    Projects
    None yet
    Milestone
    No milestone
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
    2 participants
    @chrjia @ArcturusZhang