-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Hub Generated] Public private branch 'dev-monitor-Microsoft.Insights-2021-02-01-preview' #14607
Conversation
The PR is created based on the updates in the private branch. The updates in the PR has already been reviewed and approved with this PR Azure/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/3924 |
Hi, @avjerafi Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected] |
Swagger Validation Report
|
Rule | Message |
---|---|
R3023 - OperationsAPIImplementation |
Operations API must be implemented for '/providers/Microsoft.Insights/operations'. Location: Microsoft.Insights/preview/2021-02-01-preview/scheduledQueryRule_API.json#L36 |
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isLegacyLogAnalyticsRule Location: Microsoft.Insights/preview/2021-02-01-preview/scheduledQueryRule_API.json#L337 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enabled Location: Microsoft.Insights/preview/2021-02-01-preview/scheduledQueryRule_API.json#L365 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isWorkspaceAlertsStorageConfigured Location: Microsoft.Insights/preview/2021-02-01-preview/scheduledQueryRule_API.json#L414 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: checkWorkspaceAlertsStorageConfigured Location: Microsoft.Insights/preview/2021-02-01-preview/scheduledQueryRule_API.json#L419 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: skipQueryValidation Location: Microsoft.Insights/preview/2021-02-01-preview/scheduledQueryRule_API.json#L423 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: autoMitigate Location: Microsoft.Insights/preview/2021-02-01-preview/scheduledQueryRule_API.json#L427 |
️⚠️
Avocado: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
Rule | Message |
---|---|
The default tag contains multiple API versions swaggers. readme: specification/monitor/resource-manager/readme.md tag: specification/monitor/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2020-03 |
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️
[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"monitor/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-02-preview-only",
"details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"monitor/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-02-preview-only",
"details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"|
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"monitor/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-02-preview-only",
"details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.15.456->4.15.456)"|
️️✔️
[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks. |
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
@weidongxu-microsoft As was reviewed before in the private repo, the failed checks are not related to the change that I've pushed. This change is vital in order for us to publish this private preview by the end of this week. Kindly asking for your final approval. |
@msyyc Please make a quick check if breaking changes on python is real or false alert. PR only remove |
@msyyc I kindly remind you that we are awaiting your review for a possible false alert of a breaking change in the python SDK. It is of high priority for us that we merge this small change by the end of this week. |
Co-authored-by: Avi Jerafi <[email protected]>
This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.
Changelog
Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.