-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update V5 SDK tag with latest request #14341
Conversation
Hi, @ericshape Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected] |
[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks. |
Swagger Validation Report
|
Rule | Message |
---|---|
The operation 'LedgerDigestUploads_CreateOrUpdate' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation. Location: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-02-01-preview/LedgerDigestUploads.json#L73 |
|
The operation 'LedgerDigestUploads_Disable' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation. Location: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-02-01-preview/LedgerDigestUploads.json#L184 |
|
The enum types should have x-ms-enum type extension set with appropriate options. Property name: backupStorageRedundancy Location: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-02-01-preview/RestorableDroppedDatabases.json#L165 |
|
OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'LedgerDigestUploadsModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'LedgerDigestUploads' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-02-01-preview/LedgerDigestUploads.json#L25 |
|
OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'LedgerDigestUploadsModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'LedgerDigestUploads' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-02-01-preview/LedgerDigestUploads.json#L78 |
|
OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'LedgerDigestUploadsModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'LedgerDigestUploads' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-02-01-preview/LedgerDigestUploads.json#L144 |
|
OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'LedgerDigestUploadsModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'LedgerDigestUploads' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-02-01-preview/LedgerDigestUploads.json#L189 |
|
'ledgerDigestUploads' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-02-01-preview/LedgerDigestUploads.json#L36 |
|
'ledgerDigestUploads' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-02-01-preview/LedgerDigestUploads.json#L89 |
|
'parameters' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2021-02-01-preview/LedgerDigestUploads.json#L102 |
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
Rule | Message |
---|---|
R2020 - RequiredPropertiesMissingInResourceModel |
Model definition 'FirewallRule' must have the properties 'name', 'id' and 'type' in its hierarchy and these properties must be marked as readonly. Location: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2020-11-01-preview/FirewallRules.json#L308 |
R2020 - RequiredPropertiesMissingInResourceModel |
Model definition 'ProxyResourceWithWritableName' must have the properties 'name', 'id' and 'type' in its hierarchy and these properties must be marked as readonly. Location: Microsoft.Sql/preview/2020-11-01-preview/FirewallRules.json#L298 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.Sql/stable/2014-04-01/backups_legacy.json#L52 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.Sql/stable/2014-04-01/backups_legacy.json#L88 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.Sql/stable/2014-04-01/connectionPolicies.json#L57 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.Sql/stable/2014-04-01/connectionPolicies.json#L100 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.Sql/stable/2014-04-01/dataMasking.json#L63 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.Sql/stable/2014-04-01/dataMasking.json#L103 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.Sql/stable/2014-04-01/dataMasking.json#L170 |
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.Sql/stable/2014-04-01/dataMasking.json#L218 |
️⚠️
Avocado: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
Rule | Message |
---|---|
The default tag contains multiple API versions swaggers. readme: specification/sql/resource-manager/readme.md tag: specification/sql/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-composite-v5 |
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️
[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail]
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"sql/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-composite-v5",
"details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"sql/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-composite-v5",
"details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"|
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
Rule | Message |
---|---|
AutorestCore/Exception |
"readme":"sql/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-composite-v5", "details":"Error: Plugin pre-namer reported failure." |
💬 AutorestCore/Exception | "readme":"sql/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-composite-v5", "details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.15.456->4.15.456)" |
️️✔️
[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
Hi, @ericshape your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board([email protected]). cc @akning-ms |
Hi @ericshape, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of
|
the .NET SDK failure is expected. 'cause we have not updated the .NET SDK repo. |
* Update V5 SDK with latest request * add RestorableDroppedDatabases to v5 sdk * remove the duplicated property * formatted
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
The ARMFeedback changes might not be a correct tag.
Changelog
Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.