You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Set-AzureRmNetworkInterface : Load balancer rules /subscriptions/4be8920b-2978-43d7-ab14-04d8549c1d05/resourceGroups/zhongyicf/providers/Microsoft.Ne
twork/loadBalancers/haproxylb/loadBalancingRules/lbruletcp22 and /subscriptions/4be8920b-2978-43d7-ab14-04d8549c1d05/resourceGroups/zhongyicf/provide
rs/Microsoft.Network/loadBalancers/haproxylb2/loadBalancingRules/lbruletcp22 use the same backend port (22) and protocol (Tcp), and must not be used
with the same backend ip (/subscriptions/4be8920b-2978-43d7-ab14-04d8549c1d05/resourceGroups/zhongyicf/providers/Microsoft.Network/networkInterfaces/
q5n5pznfvep6acfdefaultsa-3b1329fe-84cc-4d2a-b978-2783d6a1339c/ipConfigurations/ipconfig1).
At line:4 char:9
+ $nic1 | Set-AzureRmNetworkInterface
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : CloseError: (:) [Set-AzureRmNetworkInterface], CloudException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : Microsoft.Azure.Commands.Network.SetAzureNetworkInterfaceCommand
According to the messages, though ignore the rules issue, "must not be used
with the same backend ip" issue still can't be solved.
Is it a bug in Powershell, we can't do that, or just I didn't use right commands?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Our CloudFoundry customers want load balancers to balance both public ip addresses and private ip addresses.
So we created two load balancers, public and internal.
After the NICs were successfully added to the backend address pool of the public LB,
we used following commands to add a NIC to the internal LB:
Then got following error messages:
According to the messages, though ignore the rules issue, "must not be used
with the same backend ip" issue still can't be solved.
Is it a bug in Powershell, we can't do that, or just I didn't use right commands?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: