Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🪲 Bug Report - Incorrect APRL Recommendation #508

Open
ppascan opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

🪲 Bug Report - Incorrect APRL Recommendation #508

ppascan opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Area: Tools 🧰 Related to the tools directory and/or content Bug 🐞 Something isn't working

Comments

@ppascan
Copy link

ppascan commented Nov 5, 2024

Describe the bug

One of the recommendations that comes up under APRL - Queries in the xlsx report is "Set minimum instance count to 2 for app service". The customer has 3 instances in their portal. Could you please investigate why this might be incorrect? This did not require manual validation and therefore it came up in the PowerPoint report. Recommendation ID: 9e6682ac-31bc-4635-9959-ab74b52454e6.

To Reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behaviour:

  1. Create an app service plan. It will automatically create 3 instances for high availability.
  2. If you then run the data_collector and data_analyzer scripts on that subscription, the above recommendation will come up.

Expected behaviour

If there are 2 or more instances of the resource, the recommendation should not come up at all.

Additional context

More than happy to have a quick call to further explain and demonstrate if needed.

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the Bug 🐞 Something isn't working label Nov 5, 2024
@ppascan ppascan changed the title 🪲 Bug Report - PLEASE CHANGE ME TO SOMETHING DESCRIPTIVE 🪲 Bug Report - Incorrect APRL Recommendation Nov 5, 2024
@kpoineal
Copy link
Contributor

kpoineal commented Nov 8, 2024

@ppascan We are working on resolving this issue. I'll keep you updated as we progress.

@ppascan
Copy link
Author

ppascan commented Nov 8, 2024 via email

@oZakari oZakari added the Area: Tools 🧰 Related to the tools directory and/or content label Nov 12, 2024
@ejhenry
Copy link
Contributor

ejhenry commented Nov 25, 2024

@parthshiras and @aarthiem please review

@zebak007
Copy link
Contributor

I just faced the issue during my WARA and I wanted to report it...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Tools 🧰 Related to the tools directory and/or content Bug 🐞 Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants