chore(ci): Updated release please configuration #1787
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
spypsy
approved these changes
Aug 24, 2023
PhilWindle
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2023
🤖 I have created a new Aztec Packages release --- ## [0.1.0-alpha46](v0.1.0-alpha45...v0.1.0-alpha46) (2023-08-24) ### Features * CDP/Lending example contract ([#1554](#1554)) ([ecf6df2](ecf6df2)) * no unencrypted logs in private functions ([#1780](#1780)) ([4d8002e](4d8002e)), closes [#1689](#1689) ### Miscellaneous * **ci:** Updated release please configuration ([#1787](#1787)) ([6eb2f7a](6eb2f7a)) * sync bb master ([#1776](#1776)) ([7c6fb15](7c6fb15)) ### Documentation * events ([#1768](#1768)) ([5a38cea](5a38cea)), closes [#1756](#1756) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
dan-aztec
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2023
This PR contains further configuration changes and documentation for our usage of release please # Checklist: Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist).
dan-aztec
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2023
🤖 I have created a new Aztec Packages release --- ## [0.1.0-alpha46](v0.1.0-alpha45...v0.1.0-alpha46) (2023-08-24) ### Features * CDP/Lending example contract ([#1554](#1554)) ([ecf6df2](ecf6df2)) * no unencrypted logs in private functions ([#1780](#1780)) ([4d8002e](4d8002e)), closes [#1689](#1689) ### Miscellaneous * **ci:** Updated release please configuration ([#1787](#1787)) ([6eb2f7a](6eb2f7a)) * sync bb master ([#1776](#1776)) ([7c6fb15](7c6fb15)) ### Documentation * events ([#1768](#1768)) ([5a38cea](5a38cea)), closes [#1756](#1756) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
dan-aztec
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2023
refactor: consistent block number method naming (#1751) Renamed `AztecRPC.getBlockNum` to `getBlockNumber` and`AztecNode.getBlockHeight` to `getBlockNumber`. I decided to use the name block number because in the Ethereum JSON RPC spec there is `eth_blockNumber` call and I think it's a good idea to use the same naming. git subrepo push --branch=main docs subrepo: subdir: "docs" merged: "324402a78" upstream: origin: "https://github.com/AztecProtocol/docs" branch: "main" commit: "324402a78" git-subrepo: version: "0.4.6" origin: "???" commit: "???" refactor: Use context instead of custom oracles for public functions (#1754) Fixes #1753, #1755 and use context for nullifiers and commitments in public. docs: convert quick start guides into e2e tests (#1726) Fixes #1564 git subrepo push --branch=main docs subrepo: subdir: "docs" merged: "ba5d7a6bc" upstream: origin: "https://github.com/AztecProtocol/docs" branch: "main" commit: "ba5d7a6bc" git-subrepo: version: "0.4.6" origin: "???" commit: "???" feat(ci): Initial release please config (#1769) PR with initial release please configuration Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist). docs: including "real" code in keys docs (#1767) Including "real" code in keys docs + addressed one Noir TODO so that it doesn't get shown inside the docs. git subrepo push --branch=main docs subrepo: subdir: "docs" merged: "842a54250" upstream: origin: "https://github.com/AztecProtocol/docs" branch: "main" commit: "842a54250" git-subrepo: version: "0.4.6" origin: "???" commit: "???" feat: not retrying unrecoverable errors (#1752) Fixes #1511 Fixes #1724 With this PR all the errors thrown in the server code are considered to be unrecoverable. Recoverable errors should not be errors and should be handled (or shown only as warnings). For example I refactored the `registerAccount` and `registerRecipient` to not throw if we add the same recipient/account twice because that situation is easily recoverable (just ignore it). Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist). feat: compress debug symbols (#1760) Partial work towards #1224 While working on brillig debug symbols I noticed that the JSON ABIs started to weight more than some megabytes and started to create issues for the typescript type inference, since we're importing them as json modules. This PR addresses that by just compressing the debug symbols and decompressing them transparently in the utility function that we have for this in foundation. I used https://www.npmjs.com/package/pako for gzip since it should be compatible with the browser without issue. Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [x] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [x] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist). ci: Updated release please config (#1773) This PR contains further release-please configuration changes. Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist). feat(bb): Use an environment variable to set the transcript URL (#1750) Related to #1749 Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist). git subrepo push --branch=master circuits/cpp/barretenberg subrepo: subdir: "circuits/cpp/barretenberg" merged: "41d362e9c" upstream: origin: "https://github.com/AztecProtocol/barretenberg" branch: "master" commit: "41d362e9c" git-subrepo: version: "0.4.6" origin: "???" commit: "???" chore(ci): Updated release please config (#1775) This PR provides further release-please configuration changes. Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist). chore(ci): set up nightly barretenberg releases (#1761) This PR pulls across the publishing workflow from Noir so that barretenberg can have nightly releases. Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [x] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [x] Every change is related to the PR description. - [x] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist). chore(master): release 0.1.0-alpha45 (#1774) :robot: I have created a new Aztec Packages release --- [0.1.0-alpha45](v0.1.0-alpha44...v0.1.0-alpha45) (2023-08-23) * **bb:** Use an environment variable to set the transcript URL ([#1750](#1750)) ([31488c1](31488c1)) * **ci:** Initial release please config ([#1769](#1769)) ([4207559](4207559)) * compress debug symbols ([#1760](#1760)) ([9464b25](9464b25)) * not retrying unrecoverable errors ([#1752](#1752)) ([c0f2820](c0f2820)) * Download SRS using one canonical URL across the codebase ([#1748](#1748)) ([899b055](899b055)) * proving fails when circuit has size > ~500K ([#1739](#1739)) ([708b05c](708b05c)) * **ci:** set up nightly barretenberg releases ([#1761](#1761)) ([e0078da](e0078da)) * **ci:** Updated release please config ([#1775](#1775)) ([0085e8b](0085e8b)) * consistent block number method naming ([#1751](#1751)) ([df1afe2](df1afe2)) * Use context instead of custom oracles for public functions ([#1754](#1754)) ([46de77a](46de77a)) * convert quick start guides into e2e tests ([#1726](#1726)) ([802a678](802a678)), closes [#1564](#1564) * including "real" code in keys docs ([#1767](#1767)) ([cd9cadb](cd9cadb)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> chore: sync bb master (#1776) Ran: ``` ./scripts/git_subrepo.sh pull circuits/cpp/barretenberg git checkout origin/master -- .gitmodules ``` Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist). git_subrepo.sh: Fix parent in .gitrepo file. git subrepo push --branch=master circuits/cpp/barretenberg subrepo: subdir: "circuits/cpp/barretenberg" merged: "1b1d24e82" upstream: origin: "https://github.com/AztecProtocol/barretenberg" branch: "master" commit: "1b1d24e82" git-subrepo: version: "0.4.6" origin: "???" commit: "???" update noir contract paths feat: CDP/Lending example contract (#1554) Finishing up the lending/cdp contract enough for show (no liqudation and unsecure as all the contracts). See #1460. more instructions also reference the generated typescript file start frontend integration w/sandbox cleaner parsing of functionAbi for yup schema re-add initialValues switch to rpcclient instead of server hardcode some private keys from fixtures try singleKeyAccount thanks adam for fixing webasm import switch to vite.config.js switch to privateKey class blocked by undefined methods attribute on the PrivateTokenContract object revert yarn.lock osx change use latest yarn.lock docs: events (#1768) Fixes #1756 git subrepo push --branch=main docs subrepo: subdir: "docs" merged: "3c5f3c4a9" upstream: origin: "https://github.com/AztecProtocol/docs" branch: "main" commit: "3c5f3c4a9" git-subrepo: version: "0.4.6" origin: "???" commit: "???" feat: no unencrypted logs in private functions (#1780) Fixes #1689 git subrepo push --branch=main docs subrepo: subdir: "docs" merged: "40c05467f" upstream: origin: "https://github.com/AztecProtocol/docs" branch: "main" commit: "40c05467f" git-subrepo: version: "0.4.6" origin: "???" commit: "???" chore(ci): Updated release please configuration (#1787) This PR contains further configuration changes and documentation for our usage of release please Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist). chore(master): release 0.1.0-alpha46 (#1777) :robot: I have created a new Aztec Packages release --- [0.1.0-alpha46](v0.1.0-alpha45...v0.1.0-alpha46) (2023-08-24) * CDP/Lending example contract ([#1554](#1554)) ([ecf6df2](ecf6df2)) * no unencrypted logs in private functions ([#1780](#1780)) ([4d8002e](4d8002e)), closes [#1689](#1689) * **ci:** Updated release please configuration ([#1787](#1787)) ([6eb2f7a](6eb2f7a)) * sync bb master ([#1776](#1776)) ([7c6fb15](7c6fb15)) * events ([#1768](#1768)) ([5a38cea](5a38cea)), closes [#1756](#1756) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> chore: Add todo for using generator indices in note commitment and nullifier computation. (#1762) fix(noir): Add workaround for latest noir in account contracts (#1781) Workaround for this issue noir-lang/noir#2421 so we can update the aztec tag to master. Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [x] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist). chore: split out yarn-project bootstrap.sh (#1790) Allows for more modular bootstrapping. chore(p2p): Updated libp2p dependencies (#1792) This PR simply updates the libp2p dependencies to the newest versions. Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist). feat: `FunctionSelector` type (#1518) Fixes #1424 chore: Sandbox logging tweaks (#1797) Packages a bunch of tweaks to Sandbox debugging and logging, such as: - Wasm debug logs are now prefixed as `aztec:wasm`, not `wasm`, so they are visible when debugging via `aztec:*` - Defaults sandbox logging to INFO instead of DEBUG - Allows users to configure sandbox debug by exporting `DEBUG='aztec:*'` in their shell (related to #1605) - Silences all anvil logs since they didn't provide any useful info (fixes #1580) - Renames container names in the sandbox docker-compose (anvil was not running a fork, and the sandbox is not just an rpc-server) fix: increment time by 1 for previous rollup was warped (#1594) With Warp ``` L2 block 1: occurred at t = 100. Call warp(200) => Rollup.sol's lastBlockTs = 200 & L1.setNextBlockTimeStamp = 200. L2 block 2: txs show t = 200. Rollup published at t = 200 => Rollup.sol's lastBlockTs = 200 L2 block 3: txs show t = 200. ``` Notice how txs in block 2 and block 3 show a timestamp of 200! This is confusing. So we check if the last rollup was warped (here block 2), and if so, txs in the next rollup (block 3) should show ts = 201. We check if last rollup was warped by introducing a variable in Rollup.sol that tracks the last time block was warped. Also Create #1614 fix: selector name regression (#1800) I introduced a regression in my function [selector type PR](#1518) which caused the selector name to be incorrect in circuits.gen.ts. The issue was with having different names for selector in FunctionData struct in TS and C++. This PR fixes it. chore(master): release 0.1.0-alpha47 (#1788) :robot: I have created a new Aztec Packages release --- [0.1.0-alpha47](v0.1.0-alpha46...v0.1.0-alpha47) (2023-08-25) * `FunctionSelector` type ([#1518](#1518)) ([942f705](942f705)), closes [#1424](#1424) * increment time by 1 for previous rollup was warped ([#1594](#1594)) ([2a52107](2a52107)) * **noir:** Add workaround for latest noir in account contracts ([#1781](#1781)) ([eb8a052](eb8a052)) * selector name regression ([#1800](#1800)) ([a5be8bb](a5be8bb)) * Add todo for using generator indices in note commitment and nullifier computation. ([#1762](#1762)) ([2db6728](2db6728)) * **p2p:** Updated libp2p dependencies ([#1792](#1792)) ([79df831](79df831)) * Sandbox logging tweaks ([#1797](#1797)) ([0e3914e](0e3914e)) * split out yarn-project bootstrap.sh ([#1790](#1790)) ([1788fe6](1788fe6)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> docs: Wallet dev docs (#1746) Developer docs on wallets. Introduces a new "architecture" section for wallets, that elaborates on the RPC server and entrypoints. Deletes the "building a wallet" tutorial, since building a wallet is excessively complex for a tutorial. Fixes #1741 Closes #1745 Pending #1744 git subrepo push --branch=main docs subrepo: subdir: "docs" merged: "6f755743d" upstream: origin: "https://github.com/AztecProtocol/docs" branch: "main" commit: "6f755743d" git-subrepo: version: "0.4.6" origin: "???" commit: "???" feat: Update safe_math and move to libraries (#1803) Fixes #1794 and address the wrong check in `mul`. Would prefer to add tests directly, but noir don't support failing tests in noir yet, so there is really no good reason to do that currently. See noir-lang/noir#1994 test: add browser test to canary flow (#1808) Adding Aztec.js browser test to our canary flow to ensure published npm package is stable Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist). docs: Account contract tutorial (#1772) Tutorial for writing an account contract. Includes tweaks to payload helpers in aztec.js to make the process easier. Fixes #1744 See also #1746 --------- Co-authored-by: Michael Connor <[email protected]> git subrepo push --branch=main docs subrepo: subdir: "docs" merged: "2fd486a6c" upstream: origin: "https://github.com/AztecProtocol/docs" branch: "main" commit: "2fd486a6c" git-subrepo: version: "0.4.6" origin: "???" commit: "???" chore: fixed linter errors for `ecc`, `numeric` and `common` modules (#1714) The majority of the barretenberg codebase does not conform to our C++ style guide rules. This PR updates the `common`, `numeric` and `ecc` modules to conform to the guide. These 3 modules should now produce no linter errors. Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [x] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [x] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [x] Every change is related to the PR description. - [x] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist). --------- Co-authored-by: kevaundray <[email protected]> git subrepo push --branch=master circuits/cpp/barretenberg subrepo: subdir: "circuits/cpp/barretenberg" merged: "cca5c1bf1" upstream: origin: "https://github.com/AztecProtocol/barretenberg" branch: "master" commit: "cca5c1bf1" git-subrepo: version: "0.4.6" origin: "???" commit: "???" feat: More reliable getTxReceipt api. (#1793) Closes #1402 #1548 Previous approach had too many issues - only sender and the recipients (after they decrypt their notes) can call this api. The data in the receipt was not consistent. And the role of TxDao is confusing. Delete it now and remove some complicated code around it. Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge. - [ ] If the pull request requires a cryptography review (e.g. cryptographic algorithm implementations) I have added the 'crypto' tag. - [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line and removed unexpected formatting changes, testing logs, or commented-out code. - [ ] Every change is related to the PR description. - [ ] I have [linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue) this pull request to relevant issues (if any exist).
codygunton
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2024
* Enabled fuzzer mode * Added safe_uint fuzzer * Optimized check_circuit method in turbo_composer for more efficient fuzzing * Added fixes to circumvent assert checks when fuzzing with asserts * Added bigfield fuzzer * Added assert circumvention to bigfield fuzzer * Add fuzzer enhancements * Fixing stuff broken by low-memory prover changes * Documentation changes * Add byte_array fuzzer * Add bit_array fuzzer * bit_array fuzzer: Support the SLICE operation * bit_array fuzzer: Support the SET operation * byte_array fuzzer: Support the SET operation * field_t fuzzer: Support the SET operation * byte_array fuzzer: Invoke safe_uint_t-based constructor in SET operation * byte_array fuzzer: Fix invocation of safe_uint_t-based constructor * bigfield_t fuzzer: Support the SET operation * field_t fuzzer: Call additional field_t functions - invert() - accumulate() - assert_is_in_set() - decompose_into_bits() - operator bool_t() * bigfield_t fuzzer: Additional conversions in the SET operation * byte_array fuzzer: Invoke field_t constructor with variable byte size * Add uint fuzzer * uint fuzzer: Test all types (u8, u16, u32, u64) simultaneously * uint fuzzer: Implement the NOT opcode * uint fuzzer: Ensure uint256_t returned by get_value() has appropriate width * uint fuzzer: Add explicit sanity checks around byte_array_t/field_t conversions * uint fuzzer: Make methods static or const were appropriate * Build fuzzers with different composers * Add missing file * bigfield fuzzer: Add invariant check * Fix writeInstruction in bit_array fuzzer * Add bool fuzzer * bigfield fuzzer: Fix call to dual field_t constructor * bigfield fuzzer: Avoid divisions by zero * bigfield fuzzer: Fix call to dual field_t constructor * bigfield fuzzer: Multi-numerator division * bigfield fuzzer: Assert bigfield_t context pointer is not NULL * bigfield fuzzer: Fix multi-numerator division * Fixed cpp/hpp issue * Applied Guido's postprocessing fix * Added check_circuit fix for turbocomposer * Slightly updated docs * Disabled check_circuit error printing in Turbo in fuzzing mode * Updated toolchain * Disabling executables in a different way * More cmake optimizations * A few more makelist updates * A bit more * Removed free space Co-authored-by: Guido Vranken <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains further configuration changes and documentation for our usage of release please
Checklist:
Remove the checklist to signal you've completed it. Enable auto-merge if the PR is ready to merge.