Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(lsp): add nvim-lsp-file-operations plugin #691

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2023
Merged

Conversation

mehalter
Copy link
Member

📑 Description

This adds the nvim-lsp-file-operations plugin to the lsp category. It includes integration into neo-tree and nvim-tee.

ℹ Additional Information

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 21, 2023

Review Checklist

Does this PR follow the [Contribution Guidelines](development guidelines)? Following is a partial checklist:

Proper conventional commit scoping:

  • If you are adding a new plugin, the scope would be the name of the category it is being added into. ex. feat(utility): added noice.nvim plugin

  • If you are modifying a pre-existing plugin or pack, the scope would be the name of the plugin folder. ex. fix(noice-nvim): fix LSP handler error

  • Pull request title has the appropriate conventional commit type and scope where the scope is the name of the pre-existing directory in the project as described above

  • README is properly formatted and uses fenced in links with <url> unless they are inside a [title](url)

  • Proper usage of opts table rather than setting things up with the config function.

@mehalter mehalter requested a review from a team December 21, 2023 17:52
@mehalter mehalter force-pushed the lsp_file_operations branch 2 times, most recently from 76abb3a to c1e0730 Compare December 21, 2023 18:05
@mehalter mehalter force-pushed the lsp_file_operations branch from c1e0730 to 1bb19ab Compare December 21, 2023 18:12
@Uzaaft Uzaaft merged commit 0b5b857 into main Dec 21, 2023
12 checks passed
@Uzaaft Uzaaft deleted the lsp_file_operations branch December 21, 2023 18:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants