Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transparent.nvim incorrect category #567

Closed
3 tasks done
mehalter opened this issue Sep 10, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #568
Closed
3 tasks done

Transparent.nvim incorrect category #567

mehalter opened this issue Sep 10, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #568
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@mehalter
Copy link
Member

Checklist

  • I have searched through the AstroNvim docs
  • I have searched through the existing issues of AstroNvim
  • I have searched the existing issues of plugins related to this issue

Neovim version (nvim -v)

0.9.1

Operating system/version

Arch linux

Terminal/GUI

Kitty

Describe the bug

Transparent.nvim is added to the incorrect category. Not sure who added it or reviewed the PR but it's in the utility category which is not aligned with the categories we have as well as what is in Neovim craft. We should make sure the plugins are getting added to the correct category as described in the contribution guidelines.

Incorrect location: https://github.com/AstroNvim/astrocommunity/tree/main/lua%2Fastrocommunity%2Futility%2Ftransparent-nvim

Neovim Craft: https://neovimcraft.com/plugin/xiyaowong/nvim-transparent

Steps to Reproduce

N/A

Expected behavior

transparent.nvim should be in the color category.

Screenshots

No response

Additional Context

No response

@mehalter mehalter added the bug Something isn't working label Sep 10, 2023
@Uzaaft
Copy link
Member

Uzaaft commented Sep 10, 2023

My bad. Fixing it :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants