Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review properties used from Schema.org #10

Open
labra opened this issue Mar 2, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

Review properties used from Schema.org #10

labra opened this issue Mar 2, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@labra
Copy link
Contributor

labra commented Mar 2, 2020

As per: https://gitter.im/solid/chat?at=5e5cc3227fef7f2e89968763

The schema.org properties employed should be part of Schema.org

@InigoGutierrez
Copy link
Contributor

Interesting properties currently included in Schema.org:

  • GeoCoordinates, to represent the waypoints of the route.
  • Person, to represent the creator of the route.
  • ImageObject, for relating interesting interesting waypoints to images of them. Alternatively, Photograph, but this one has a lot of properties probably not interesting (and it is not mandatory for all images to be photographs).

Data types of possible fields of a route:

  • DateTime, to store the creation date of a route.

@Angelixus
Copy link

@InigoGutierrez if you see issue #3 most of those proposals are already taken into account

@Raulpemol
Copy link

We proposed this format some time ago. Please review it and tell us what you think. The issue is open for discussion.

Arquisoft/viade_en2a#27

@uo258865
Copy link

uo258865 commented Mar 3, 2020

@Raulpemol I think your idea is fantastic and better than the other one that is merged in this repository. Thanks for the example in your repository, it made easier to understand.

@labra
Copy link
Contributor Author

labra commented Mar 4, 2020

Could you try to integrate your idea into the proposal currently made in the repository?

Notice that I updated the proposal to have a better support for the prefixes and so on.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants